<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Leah Christians | The Verge</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.</subtitle>

	<updated>2015-11-17T13:19:30+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/author/leah-christians" />
	<id>https://www.theverge.com/authors/leah-christians/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.theverge.com/authors/leah-christians/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&amp;h=150&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Leah Christians</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The dictionary, emoji, and redefining the word &#8216;word&#8217;]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2015/11/17/9748698/oxford-dictionaries-word-emoji-lumbersexual" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2015/11/17/9748698/oxford-dictionaries-word-emoji-lumbersexual</id>
			<updated>2015-11-17T08:19:30-05:00</updated>
			<published>2015-11-17T08:19:30-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="TL;DR" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[As autumn grows colder and fallen leaves crunch beneath our thick-soled boots, we, as People Of The Internet, annually await, or bemoan, year-end lists and superlatives. While more patient humans may consider it far too early to release a &#8220;best of&#8221; highlight list for the year past (reminder: it is mid-November), Oxford Dictionaries has chosen [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15582825/4093455287_211bbb4a2e_z.0.1447763908.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>As autumn grows colder and fallen leaves crunch beneath our thick-soled boots, we, as People Of The Internet, annually await, or bemoan, year-end lists and superlatives. While more patient humans may consider it far too early to release a &#8220;best of&#8221; highlight list for the year past (reminder: it is mid-November), Oxford Dictionaries has chosen to get a head start on its Word of the Year award.</p>

<p>Grammar geeks, like myself, take this as a time to learn something new about the way our culture is adapting language to best fit our modern society, perhaps to inform our decisions on what is considered acceptable in writing. This year, however, the highest lexical honor has been bestowed upon an emoji: <a href="http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2015/11/word-of-the-year-2015-emoji">Faces with Tears of Joy</a>. I generally trust the Oxford Dictionaries; while not <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/">my dictionary of choice</a>, it has a reputation that garners respect from those of us who make it our business to understand how and why words are put together and used. Choosing an emoji as Word of the Year for 2015 is contradictory in and of itself, as emoji are, by definition and I doubt I need to spell this out, not words. If one of the most revered language authorities in the world bastardizes its own definition of the word &#8220;word,&#8221; what use are any rules of morphology?</p>
<p><q class="right">Emoji are not words</q></p>
<p>Now I understand that language is meant to evolve, and I am not a grammar purist, but language is bound by rationality &mdash; if I can find logic behind something otherwise petty or nonsensical (looking at you <a href="http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/further-versus-farther">&#8220;farther&#8221; vs. &#8220;further&#8221;</a>), there&rsquo;s less cause for concern. And I understand the importance contrasting Ms. Language Person&rsquo;s Guide to Grammar with the everyday language we use in speech and writing, especially on the internet &mdash; &#8220;wut,&#8221; &#8220;h8r,&#8221; and &#8220;yaaaaas&#8221; are used almost daily in my vocabulary. But with so many choices on Oxford Dictionaries&#8217; shortlist that would make excellent selections for Word of the Year, why defy your own definition and instead choose, let&rsquo;s call it what it is, a pictogram?</p>

<p>Furthermore, Faces with Tears of Joy, really? There are far better emoji to pick from. I understand that it was chosen because data gathered in partnership with SwiftKey showed that it was the most frequently used emoji in the world, but since when has a Word of the Year prize ever been awarded to the word that was the most often said or written? &#8220;The&#8221;: a riveting choice! &#8220;Of&#8221;: stellar and unique! &#8220;And&#8221;: who could forget the banner year for conjunctions!</p>

<p>Oxford Dictionaries could have more esteem for words and their ever-changing use in our lives, or at the very least, picked a spicier emoji as the quintessential &#8220;word&#8221; of 2015. My vote is for &#8220;<a href="http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/lumbersexual">lumbersexual</a>.&#8221;</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Leah Christians</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Which watch? The Watch watch]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2015/4/8/8371239/apple-watch-iwatch-terrible-name" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2015/4/8/8371239/apple-watch-iwatch-terrible-name</id>
			<updated>2015-04-08T14:50:17-04:00</updated>
			<published>2015-04-08T14:50:17-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="TL;DR" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Apple Watch is a watch. The Watch is a watch. Watch. At this point of my day, as copy editor of The Verge, I&#8217;ve read the word &#8220;watch&#8221; so many times that it hardly looks like a real word any more. In an ever-changing landscape of scientific and technological innovation, my job is to [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Stephen Lam/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15325605/GettyImages-465696902.0.1428516625.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The Apple Watch is a watch. The Watch is a watch. Watch.</p>

<p>At this point of my day, as copy editor of <em>The Verge</em>, I&rsquo;ve read the word &#8220;watch&#8221; so many times that it hardly looks like a real word any more. In an ever-changing landscape of scientific and technological innovation, my job is to ensure that the words published on this site are written in the least ambiguous way possible, whether that means adding a comma here or there, choosing a standardized spelling for a new type of gadget, or making the call on whether or not a title needs to begin with a capital letter. This last task has been particularly trying today, as Apple has chosen to name the newest addition to its consumer tech fleet, simply, the &#8220;Watch,&#8221; deviating from its conventional naming procedure by eschewing the predictable &#8220;iWatch&#8221; (a trend that seems to be continuing in the death of iPhoto and the <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2015/4/8/8367469/apple-photos-app-launch-iphoto-replacement">phoenix-like birth of Photos</a>). This choice, from the standpoint of a copyeditor, is, frankly, a nuisance. While there is a certain authority associated with the capital-W Watch moniker, it also evokes the same feeling as Donald Trump referring to himself as &#8220;The Donald.&#8221;</p>

<p>Differentiating between the need for &#8220;Watch&#8221; and &#8220;watch&#8221; can be tricky at times, but at least written word allows us that luxury. What am I supposed to do when my friends want to talk to me about my work in person?</p>

<p>&#8220;Hey Leah, I loved <a href="http://www.theverge.com/a/apple-watch-review"><em>The Verge</em>&rsquo;s Watch review</a>.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;Thanks! Which one?&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;You know&#8230;the Watch. It looks incredible; I really want one.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;I honestly don&rsquo;t know which watch you mean.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;Which watch? The Watch watch.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;Oh, the <em>Watch</em> watch! Why didn&rsquo;t you say so?&#8221;</p>

<p>Most sites have taken to calling the Watch the Apple Watch, which is the closest compromise. Apple itself labels the watch (below) as an image of the Apple logo followed by &#8220;Watch,&#8221; placing the company in a short line of corporate entities and pop stars that have replaced the alphabet with an icon.</p>

<p>This ambiguity will likely take seconds, nay minutes of my life from me, and for that, Apple, I may never forgive you.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/692066/DSC_5166.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Apple Watch Tim Cook" title="Apple Watch Tim Cook" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Leah Christians</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Mitt Romney warns against the dangers of the internet]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2015/3/20/8267393/mitt-romney-katie-couric-internet-trolls" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2015/3/20/8267393/mitt-romney-katie-couric-internet-trolls</id>
			<updated>2015-03-20T21:32:02-04:00</updated>
			<published>2015-03-20T21:32:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="TL;DR" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Watch This" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Everyone&#8217;s favorite former presidential hopeful / Netflix documentary star Mitt Romney has some prudent advice for the internet users of the world. In an interview with Yahoo global news anchor Katie Couric, Romney, along with members of his ever-expanding clan, shared that he was encouraged to avoid the comments on social media during his campaigns. [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15304382/GettyImages-461655496.0.1426890075.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Everyone&#8217;s favorite former presidential hopeful / Netflix documentary star Mitt Romney has some prudent advice for the internet users of the world. In an <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/video/romney-family-opens-katie-couric-020048547.html">interview</a> with <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/25/5142932/katie-couric-joins-yahoo-global-anchor">Yahoo global news anchor</a> Katie Couric, Romney, along with members of his ever-expanding clan, shared that he was encouraged to avoid the comments on social media during his campaigns. &#8220;You don&#8217;t want to have some 25-year-old writer that is attacking you in your mind all day.&#8221; Even Mitt&#8217;s better half, <a href="https://twitter.com/lahlahlindsey/status/426862614610579456">notorious horse-tongue-grabber </a>Ann Romney, chimed in: &#8220;The Instagram comments now are just cruel.&#8221;</p>

<p>Romney claimed that he &#8220;didn&#8217;t read the news&#8221; or the comments on the internet about his campaign, but TV, on the other hand, was a safe zone. It seemed, in the eyes of Romney&#8217;s advisers, that the vitriol of the news in print and online wouldn&#8217;t reach television.</p>

<p>It is no novel observation that the internet can be a sometimes hostile place, especially toward Romney. Avoiding the hate brewed in the bowels of the net and all of the &#8220;trolling going on&#8221; is probably a contributing reason why the Romneys have been able to stay so chipper despite <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfXgpem78kQ">calamity</a> and <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/secret-video-romney-private-fundraiser">humiliation</a>. Though <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/mitt-romney-2016-elections-decision-114756.html">the end to his time in the political spotlight</a> may be growing nearer, we can all hold this morsel of guidance near and dear to our hearts for years to come. You heard Papa Mittens; stay away from the comments.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Leah Christians</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Verge Playlist: Victory for the internet]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2015/2/28/8125637/the-verge-playlist-victory-for-the-internet" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2015/2/28/8125637/the-verge-playlist-victory-for-the-internet</id>
			<updated>2015-02-28T19:00:02-05:00</updated>
			<published>2015-02-28T19:00:02-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Entertainment" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Music" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[It has been a glorious week for the internet. We were perplexed by the color of a (kind of tacky) dress, we got emotionally invested in a high-speed llama chase, a new season of House of Cards is on Netflix, and, most importantly, the FCC has officially voted in favor of Title II classification for [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Noam Galai/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15278050/GettyImages_451734908.0.1425141810.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>It has been a glorious week for the internet. We were <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/26/8118825/white-gold-dress-blue-black-what-color">perplexed</a> by the color of a (kind of tacky) dress, we got <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/26/8116693/live-the-internet-is-going-bananas-for-this-llama-chase">emotionally invested</a> in a high-speed llama chase, <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/27/8091401/house-of-cards-season-3-available-now-netflix">a new season of <em>House of Cards</em></a> is on Netflix, and, most importantly, the FCC has <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/26/8114265/fcc-ruling-net-neutrality-victory-internet-title-ii">officially voted</a> in favor of Title II classification for the internet. Let&rsquo;s raise our glasses to Tom Wheeler with this playlist of tracks by <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/23/8091789/musicians-support-net-neutrality-reclassification">supporters of net neutrality</a> and songs that capture the tenacious spirit of the open internet.</p>

<p>If you&rsquo;re in a revolutionary mood, I suggest you start with &#8220;Try Out Your Voice&#8221; by Big D &amp; the Kids Table. Revel along with Deniece Williams&rsquo; &#8220;Let&rsquo;s Hear It For the Boy,&#8221; which I can only imagine was intended to laud Chairman Wheeler. Or maybe just take <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/26/8114191/fcc-menahan-street-band-net-neutrality">a cue from the FCC</a>, and get funky with the Menahan Street Band.</p>
<div>.playlist-wrapper{display:block;margin:0 -20px 0 -95px;*zoom:1}.playlist-wrapper:before,.playlist-wrapper:after{content:" ";display:table}.playlist-wrapper:after{clear:both}.playlist-wrapper iframe{display:block;float:left;margin:26px}.playlist-wrapper iframe:first-child{margin-right:0}.track-list{padding:0 !important;margin:0 0 20px 0}.track-list li{padding:.5em;margin:0 !important;list-style-position:inside}.track-list b{color:#555;margin-left:1em}.track-list i{font-style:normal;color:#555;float:right;width:20em}.track-list li:nth-child(even){background-color:#eee}</div><ol class="track-list"> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Deniece Williams &#8211; Let&#8217;s Hear It for the Boy</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>OK Go &#8211; The One Moment</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Junior Senior &#8211; Move Your Feet</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Clap Your Hands Say Yeah &#8211; On This Tidal Wave of Your Blood</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Ginuwine &#8211; Differences</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Big D &amp; the Kids Table &#8211; Try Out Your Voice</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Thao &#8211; Bag of Hammers</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>The New Pornographers &#8211; The Laws Have Changed</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Menahan Street Band &#8211; Montego Sunset</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>My Morning Jacket &#8211; One Big Holiday</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>ELO &#8211; Don&rsquo;t Bring Me Down</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Satchel Grande &#8211; Working Title Pt. 2</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Katy Perry &#8211; This is How We Do</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>George Michael &#8211; Careless Whisper</strong></font></li> <li><font color="#555555"><strong>Beastie Boys &#8211; Fight For Your Right</strong></font></li> </ol><p><iframe src="https://embed.spotify.com/?uri=spotify:user:kopam:playlist:0qQTargoXoG7oYH7D00ApZ" width="300" height="380" frameborder="0"></iframe> <iframe width="345" height="380" src="https://rd.io/i/QVmx0jObous/" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Leah Christians</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Listen to over 100 songs from the new &#8216;Grand Theft Auto V&#8217;]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2014/11/17/7236215/listen-to-new-tracks-from-gta-v-re-release" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2014/11/17/7236215/listen-to-new-tracks-from-gta-v-re-release</id>
			<updated>2014-11-17T16:16:24-05:00</updated>
			<published>2014-11-17T16:16:24-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Entertainment" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Gaming" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[While Grand Theft Auto V is arguably the best game of the GTA series, perhaps the best part of the game (as is the case with the entire franchise) is its soundtrack. For this week&#8217;s Xbox One / PlayStation 4 re-release, Rockstar has updated the music with &#8220;over 100 additional new songs&#8221; &#8212; and thanks [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15068251/GTAV_in-car_image.0.0.1417218277.jpeg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>While <em>Grand Theft Auto V</em> is arguably the best game of the <em>GTA</em> series, perhaps the best part of the game (as is the case with the entire franchise) is its soundtrack. For this week&#8217;s Xbox One / PlayStation 4 <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/17/7234541/grand-theft-auto-v-in-first-person-is-crazy">re-release</a>, <a href="http://www.rockstargames.com/newswire/article/52308/grand-theft-auto-v-release-dates-and-exclusive-content">Rockstar has updated</a> the music with &#8220;over 100 additional new songs&#8221; &mdash; and thanks to the Reddit gods, we&#8217;ve got a <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/PS4/comments/2mi8ts/list_of_confirmed_new_gta_v_songs_with_links/">near-complete playlist</a>.</p>

<p>The Reddit community has confirmed 157 of the reported 162 new songs (in addition to the returning tracks from last year&#8217;s version). The confirmed tracks were &#8220;heard or seen on <em>GTA V</em> live streams&#8221; and are guaranteed to make your cruise around Los Santos fit any situation you&#8217;re in. It includes a vast array of songs from recent hits by Lorde (&#8220;Tennis Court&#8221;) and Maroon 5 (&#8220;Moves Like Jagger&#8221;) to classics from ZZ Top and Dr. Dre. Most importantly, you can even pretend you&#8217;re Ryan Gosling&#8217;s character from <em>Drive</em> and blast Kavinsky&#8217;s &#8220;Nightcall&#8221; through the speakers of any vehicle (stolen or not) of your choice. It&#8217;s the ultimate cross-over of criminals and music connoisseurs.</p>
<p><iframe frameborder="0" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/BHVbbcHWX4k?rel=0&amp;showinfo=0" height="371" width="660"></iframe></p>
<p>Rockstar also announced earlier this month that the original <em>GTA V</em> soundtrack is will also be <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/3/7151395/grand-theft-auto-v-soundtrack-vinyl">available on vinyl</a> in December in addition to the selection of music from the game currently <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/9/24/4766398/grand-theft-auto-v-soundtrack-is-now-on-itunes">available digitally on iTunes</a>. All of the new songs are linked in the Reddit post, and one Reddit user has even been so kind as to create a Spotify playlist with the new songs:</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://embed.spotify.com/?uri=spotify:user:joem92:playlist:4QcRl4EEF4wClSGOq4Qkxv" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="380"></iframe></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
