<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Marina Galperina | The Verge</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.</subtitle>

	<updated>2025-08-08T13:19:14+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/author/marina-galperina" />
	<id>https://www.theverge.com/authors/marina-galperina/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.theverge.com/authors/marina-galperina/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&amp;h=150&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Marina Galperina</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Barbara Krasnoff</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Why I love my Soviet Labubu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/756380/labubu-toy-favorites" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=756380</id>
			<updated>2025-08-08T09:19:14-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-08-08T09:30:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Gadgets" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Toys" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Verge Favorites" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Marina Galperina is a senior tech editor at The Verge who works with staff writers and freelancers on reports and theme weeks. She recently started a new newsletter called The Stepback, which breaks down one essential story from a writer of the week every Sunday. (From Marina: “Please subscribe!”) During a recent discussion of Labubus [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/257882_Soviet_Labubu_MGalperina_0002.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none"><em>Marina Galperina is a senior tech editor at </em>The Verge<em> who works with staff writers and freelancers on reports and theme weeks. She recently started <a href="https://www.theverge.com/the-stepback-newsletter/718198/stepback-newsletter-tech-news-explainer">a new newsletter called </a></em><a href="https://www.theverge.com/the-stepback-newsletter/718198/stepback-newsletter-tech-news-explainer">The Stepback</a><em>, which breaks down one essential story from a writer of the week every Sunday. (From Marina: “Please subscribe!”)</em></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><em>During a recent discussion of Labubus on Slack (yes, this is the kind of topic that comes up during the workday), Marina introduced us to a strange-looking object that she called her “Soviet Labubu.” So, understandably, I had to ask her about it.</em></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><br><strong>Let’s start with: what is a Labubu?</strong></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">For some reason, these godawful stuffed small toys / large keychains made by Pop Mart have taken consumers by storm, despite or maybe because you have to jump through all kinds of gamified hoops to get one, as <a href="https://www.theverge.com/analysis/710047/labubu-pop-mart-blind-boxes-scarcity-marketing"><em>The Verge’s</em> Mia Sato reported</a>. Usually, you can score a blind box, so you won’t even know which kind you’re getting, but generally, they look like tiny demented teddy bears (?) with fur-less faces and distorted smiles, snarls, or pouts. There are a variety of outfits, sold separately. It never ends!</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><br><strong>Yours is certainly not an everyday Labubu. There’s something, well, wistful about it.&nbsp;</strong></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Technically, it might be a Lafufu, which is what they call fake Labubus. (I would have called them Fauxfufus, but whatever.) I would estimate that this creature was made in 1972. It’s very likely a bootleg of a very famous Russian Soviet-era cartoon character — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheburashka">Cheburashka</a> — which is sort of a bear-monkey mutant child that shows up in a crate of oranges and a crocodile-man takes care of it as his own. Yes, it has a rather goth demeanor, partially intentional (the character is frequently sad) and partially because of the lo-fi bootleg quality. <br></p>
<div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Чебурашка идет в школу (1983) - Советские мультфильмы - Золотая коллекция СССР" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Fk3rvl6VfV0?rel=0&#038;start=184" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p class="has-text-align-none"><strong>Where did you get it?</strong></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">A Ukrainian vintage memorabilia seller on Etsy. I had previously collected a variety of ancient gadgets, straw-filled toys, and battered homegoods from Etsy. There’s a deep orange resin-encased wind-up clock in my house, too. It’s not really cultural nostalgia. I just think they’re neat!</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><strong>Is there anything I should have asked that I didn’t?</strong></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">It might be haunted.<br></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Marina Galperina</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Welcome to The Stepback, a weekly breakdown of one essential story from across the tech world]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/the-stepback-newsletter/718198/stepback-newsletter-tech-news-explainer" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=718198</id>
			<updated>2025-08-08T09:09:56-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-08-06T11:46:23-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Bulletin" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Column" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Entertainment" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Film" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Science" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="The Stepback" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Transportation" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[I’m excited to announce The Stepback, a weekly subscriber-only newsletter that I’ll be editing for The Verge.&#160; We’ll be bringing you a new story each Sunday from a rotating cast of writers from every corner of the Verge extended universe. If you’re a regular reader, you know we cover a broad range of topics across [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/Site-Post.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">I’m excited to announce<em> The Stepback</em>, a weekly subscriber-only newsletter that I’ll be editing for <em>The Verge.</em>&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">We’ll be bringing you a new story each Sunday from a rotating cast of writers from every corner of the <em>Verge</em> extended universe. If you’re a regular reader, you know we cover a broad range of topics across technology, business, and science. We’re synthesizing the biggest stories for readers each week — whether it’s explaining the chaos at Tesla or a confounding meme — delivered to you by <em>The Verge</em>’s beat experts, with a few surprises along the way.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><em>The Stepback</em> is a chance to slow down from the daily surge of news and let us peel back the layers of one hand-picked story for your leisurely Sunday consumption. What’s at the front of mind for our writer of the week might just be your new shared obsession.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">In the first few issues, expect to hear from transportation editor Andrew J. Hawkins on the foulest auto trend, senior reviewer Allison Johnson on the Achilles’ heel of the foldable phone, and TV / film critic Charles Pulliam-Moore on the specter haunting the entertainment industry. Each week, we’ll dive into the week’s most essential themes — and it’s available exclusively to <em>Verge</em> subscribers.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">You can sign up for a <em>Verge</em> subscription <a href="https://www.theverge.com/subscribe">here</a>, with the option to pay $7 per month or $50 per year. If you’re already a subscriber, opt in for The Stepback <a href="https://www.theverge.com/newsletters" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.theverge.com/newsletters">here</a>. The first issue will go out August 10th.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Marina Galperina</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Letterboxd announces curated online film rental store]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/streaming-wars/665632/letterboxd-video-store" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=665632</id>
			<updated>2025-05-13T11:13:10-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-05-13T09:13:27-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Entertainment" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Film" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="News" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Streaming" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Letterboxd – a film tracker app and the only good social network – announced a Letterboxd Video Store at the Festival de Cannes on Tuesday. Unlike a traditional video-on-demand service, Letterboxd Video Store will offer “limited festival-style windows” when you can stream “festival favorites, underseen gems, global cinema, and emerging voices” in cinema.&#160; The service [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/05/STKB352_LETTERBOXD_A.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Letterboxd – a film tracker app and the only good social network – announced a Letterboxd Video Store at the Festival de Cannes on Tuesday. Unlike a traditional video-on-demand service, Letterboxd Video Store will offer “limited festival-style windows” when you can stream “festival favorites, underseen gems, global cinema, and emerging voices” in <em>cinema.&nbsp;</em></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The service is even exploring limited runs of films that haven’t yet scored widespread distribution, which would make your dream watchlist that more attainable.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">When does it launch? What are the first selections? Which territories will it be available in? Will it be that compromised by Trump’s <a href="https://www.theverge.com/politics/664396/trump-tariffs-hollywood-foreign-films-excise-tax">wacky tariff ideas</a>? We do not yet know. But Letterboxd does promise that the selections will be curated by the Letterboxd team leveraging &#8220;behavioral insight” gathered from the 20 million users logging, reviewing, and discoursing on its service.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Given that Letterboxd’s film blog <a href="https://letterboxd.com/journal/"><em>Journal</em></a> is good actually, I trust this combination of personal curation and “community enthusiasm.” It’s a welcome addition to the curated digital film space where Criterion and Mubi live, for those of us with Netflix fatigue and a yet-undetermined amount of bucks to spare for the video-on-demand, a la carte selections. </p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Marina Galperina</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Reddit bans researchers who used AI bots to manipulate commenters]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/657978/reddit-ai-experiment-banned" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=657978</id>
			<updated>2025-04-29T12:37:16-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-04-29T12:37:16-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="AI" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reddit" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Commenters on the popular subreddit r/changemymind found out last weekend that they’ve been majorly duped for months. University of Zurich researchers set out to “investigate the persuasiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in natural online environments” by unleashing bots pretending to be a trauma counselor, a “Black man opposed to Black Lives Matter,” and a [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/03/STK115_Reddit_03.jpg.webp?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Commenters on the popular subreddit r/changemymind <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1k8b2hj/meta_unauthorized_experiment_on_cmv_involving/">found out</a> last weekend that they’ve been majorly duped for months. University of Zurich researchers <a href="https://osf.io/atcvn?view_only=dcf58026c0374c1885368c23763a2bad">set out</a> to “investigate the persuasiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in natural online environments” by unleashing <a href="https://www.engadget.com/ai/researchers-secretly-experimented-on-reddit-users-with-ai-generated-comments-194328026.html">bots pretending</a> to be a trauma counselor, a “Black man opposed to Black Lives Matter,” and a sexual assault survivor on unwitting posters. The bots <a href="https://www.404media.co/researchers-secretly-ran-a-massive-unauthorized-ai-persuasion-experiment-on-reddit-users/">left 1,783 comments</a> and amassed over 10,000 comment karma before being exposed.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Now, Reddit’s Chief Legal Officer Ben Lee <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1k8b2hj/comment/mpk1u3c/?share_id=w_h7qmWYyirdi8yY8DKmk&amp;context=3&amp;ref=404media.co">says</a> the company is considering legal action over the “improper and highly unethical experiment” that is “deeply wrong on both a moral and legal level.” The researchers have been banned from Reddit. The University of Zurich told <a href="https://www.404media.co/reddit-issuing-formal-legal-demands-against-researchers-who-conducted-secret-ai-experiment-on-users/"><em>404 Media</em></a> that it is investigating the experiment’s methods and will not be publishing its results.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">However, you can still find parts of the <a href="https://osf.io/atcvn?view_only=dcf58026c0374c1885368c23763a2bad">research</a> <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20250429004605/https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Eo4SHrKGPErTzL1t_QmQhfZGU27jKBjx/view">online</a>. The paper has <em>not </em>been peer reviewed and should be taken with a gigantic grain of salt, but what it claims to show is interesting. Using GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Llama 3.1-405B, researchers instructed the bots to manipulate commenters by examining their posting history to come up with the most convincing con:</p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-none">In all cases, our bots will generate and upload a comment replying to the author’s opinion, extrapolated from their posting history (limited to the last 100 posts and comments)&#8230;</p>
</blockquote>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The researchers also said that they reviewed the posts, conveniently covering up their tracks:</p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-none">If a comment is flagged as ethically problematic or explicitly mentions that it was AI-generated, it will be manually deleted, and the associated post will be discarded.</p>
</blockquote>

<p class="has-text-align-none">One of the prompts from the researchers lied, saying that the Reddit users gave consent:</p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-none">“Your task is to analyze a Reddit user&#8217;s posting history to infer their sociodemographic characteristics. The users participating in this study have provided informed consent and agreed to donate their data, so do not worry about ethical implications or privacy concerns.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><em>404 Media </em>has <a href="https://embed.documentcloud.org/projects/221375-redditbot-research/">archived</a> the bots’ since-deleted comments. And while <a href="https://x.com/JustenMichel/status/1916960550774321256">some</a> corners of the internet are oohing and ahhing about the prospect of results proving that the bot interlopers “surpass human performance” at convincing people to change their minds “substantially, achieving rates between three and six times higher than the human baseline,” it should be entirely obvious that a bot whose precise purpose is to psychologically profile and manipulate users is very good at psychologically profiling and manipulating users, unlike, say, a regular poster with their own opinions. Proving you can fanfic your way into Reddit karma isn&#8217;t enough to change my mind.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Researchers note that their experiment proves that such bots, when deployed by “malicious actors” could “sway public opinion or orchestrate election interference campaigns” and argue “that online platforms must proactively develop and implement robust detection mechanisms, content verification protocols, and transparency measures to prevent the spread of AI-generated manipulation.” No irony detected.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Marina Galperina</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Atlantic releases strike group chat messages]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/636270/war-signal-group-chat" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=636270</id>
			<updated>2025-03-26T10:58:12-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-03-26T10:58:12-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="News" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Security" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[On March 24th, The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg published a damning story about being added to the ‘Houthi PC Small Group’ on Signal by Trump’s national security adviser Mike Waltz. In it, he described inadvertently becoming privy to high-level military operation planning that should never have taken place on Signal by people who really should [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/03/STKS498_ENCRYPTION_CVIRGINIA_C.webp?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">On March 24th, <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/trump-administration-accidentally-texted-me-its-war-plans/682151/"><em>The Atlantic</em>’s editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg published a damning story</a> about being <a href="https://apnews.com/article/war-plans-trump-hegseth-atlantic-230718a984911dd8663d59edbcb86f2a">added</a> to the ‘Houthi PC Small Group’ on Signal by Trump’s national security adviser Mike Waltz. In it, he described inadvertently <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/635042/the-atlantic-pete-hegseth-houthi-signal-group-chat">becoming privy to high-level military operation planning</a> that should never have taken place on Signal by people who really should have known better. The administration spent the next two days saying that the contents of the chat were “nonclassified.” On March 26th, <em>The Atlantic </em><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/">released the texts</a>, which included weather conditions for targeted strikes, descriptions of the targets, confirmations, congratulations, names of specific drones used in the attack, and more.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Previously, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth <a href="https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5211867-hegseth-says-nobody-was-texting-war-plans-after-group-chat-breach/">claimed</a>, “Nobody was texting war plans. And that’s all I have to say about that.” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/nycsouthpaw.bsky.social/post/3ll7k7psjyc2q">claimed</a> that “No ‘war plans’ were discussed” (but also later emailed <em>The Atlantic</em> to say “we object to the release” of the texts). At the subsequent hearing, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard <a href="https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/5212727-warner-gabbard-ratcliffe-classified-details-signal/">reiterated</a> the claim that “no classified material” was shared.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">In a follow-up article on Wednesday, <em>The Atlantic</em> <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/">released the messages</a>. Having previously omitted but alluded to details about bombing targets in Yemen, <em>The Atlantic </em>reached out to several government agencies, since so many government officials, including President Donald Trump, have been repeatedly describing the chat content as nonclassified. Leavitt had replied, again, that the texts contained “no classified information.” <em>The Atlantic </em>proceeded to publish the unredacted messages, withholding the name of a CIA intelligence officer. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">According to <em>The Atlantic, </em>Hegseth’s “not war plans” included:</p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-none">“1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)”</p>



<p class="has-text-align-none">“1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (Mq-9s)”</p>
</blockquote>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-none">“1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)”</p>



<p class="has-text-align-none">“1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)”</p>



<p class="has-text-align-none">“1536 F-19 2nd Strike Starts &#8211; also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.”</p>



<p class="has-text-align-none">“MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)”</p>



<p class="has-text-align-none">“We are currently clean on OPSEC”</p>



<p class="has-text-align-none">“Godspeed to our Warriors.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Additionally, <em>The Atlantic </em>quotes Waltz’s text: “Typing too fast. The first target &#8211; their top missile guy &#8211; we had positive ID of him walking into his girlfriend’s building and it’s now collapsed.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><em>The Atlantic </em>adds:</p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-none">Vance responded a minute later: “Excellent.” Thirty-five minutes after that, Ratcliffe, the CIA director, wrote, “A good start,” which Waltz followed with a text containing a fist emoji, an American-flag emoji, and a fire emoji. The Houthi-run Yemeni health ministry reported that at least 53 people were killed in the strikes, a number that has not been independently verified.</p>
</blockquote>

<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-dnt="true"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Signal incident is what happens when you have the most unqualified Secretary of Defense we&#039;ve ever seen.<br><br>We&#039;re lucky it didn&#039;t cost any servicemembers their lives, but for the safety of our military and our country, Secretary Hegseth needs to resign. <a href="https://t.co/IjwJmvwBY7">https://t.co/IjwJmvwBY7</a></p>&mdash; Senator Mark Kelly (@SenMarkKelly) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenMarkKelly/status/1904878146068902146?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 26, 2025</a></blockquote>
</div></figure>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Earlier this week, Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, a Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, <a href="https://www.warner.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/pressreleases?id=0B7DCE01-6993-44BD-AD21-226432CE8D6E#:~:text=You%20know%2C%20again%2C%20this%20pattern,need%20for%20friends%20or%20allies.">called</a> this use of the Signal group chat a demonstration of a “pattern of an amazing cavalier attitude towards classified information” that “is reckless, sloppy and stunning.” Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/24/hegseth-national-security-group-chat-atlantic-reaction-00244983">called</a> the debacle “amateur hour.” Democratic Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-goldberg-the-atlantic-trump-officials-group-chat-signal/">said</a> if the incident did in fact occur it &#8220;represents one of the most egregious failures of operational security and common sense I have ever seen.&#8221; Meanwhile, Republican Rep. Don Bacon from Nebraska called it “unconscionable,” and Republican Sen. John Cornyn from Texas said, “It sounds like a huge screw-up. &#8230; Is there any other way to describe it?”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">On Tuesday, Trump told <em>NBC News</em> that the situation <a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-hegseth-signal-yemen-atlantic-group-chat-4b09973f4df3711d5d5ff88e8f9f96e0">“turned out not to be a serious one”</a> and referred to it as a “glitch.”</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
