<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Rafi Letzter | The Verge</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.</subtitle>

	<updated>2022-03-30T15:00:00+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/author/rafi-letzter" />
	<id>https://www.theverge.com/authors/rafi-letzter/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.theverge.com/authors/rafi-letzter/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&amp;h=150&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Rafi Letzter</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Meet Earendel, the most distant star ever detected]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/30/23002980/earendel-hubble-most-distant-star-gravitational-lensing-jwst" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/30/23002980/earendel-hubble-most-distant-star-gravitational-lensing-jwst</id>
			<updated>2022-03-30T11:00:00-04:00</updated>
			<published>2022-03-30T11:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Science" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Space" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The most distant star &#8212; or possibly pair of stars &#8212; that astronomers have ever seen was just revealed thanks to the Hubble telescope and a massive cluster of galaxies. Far from Earth, the universe bends around the vast bulk of a galaxy cluster, creating a gravitational lens in spacetime much like the curved lens [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="The Sunrise Arc, and Earendel | NASA/ESA, B. Welch, D. Coe" data-portal-copyright="NASA/ESA, B. Welch, D. Coe" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23355156/sunrisearc_unlabeled.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	The Sunrise Arc, and Earendel | NASA/ESA, B. Welch, D. Coe	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The most distant star &mdash; or possibly pair of stars &mdash; that astronomers have ever seen was just revealed thanks to the Hubble telescope and a massive cluster of galaxies. Far from Earth, the universe bends around the vast bulk of a galaxy cluster, creating a gravitational lens in spacetime much like the curved lens in a magnifying glass. Like a magnifying glass, it revealed something small and hidden: a star system from the early universe.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The far-away star system takes the official name WHL0137-LS, but the astronomers who found it nicknamed it &ldquo;Earendel&rdquo; from the Old English word meaning &ldquo;morning star&rdquo; or &ldquo;rising light.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Earendel system as we&rsquo;re seeing it today was shining within just 900 million years of the Big Bang, according to the authors of a <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04449-y">new paper in the journal <em>Nature</em></a> describing the discovery. Fully 12.8 billion years passed before that light reached the Hubble Space Telescope, magnified by a lucky trick of gravity to appear as a tiny smudge of photons on Hubble&rsquo;s image sensor. Earendel is 8.2 billion years older than the Sun and Earth and 12.1 billion years older than our planet&rsquo;s first animals.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Even by the standards of ancient stars, Earendel stands out: astronomers observed the previous record holder, nicknamed Icarus, as it appeared 9.4 billion years ago &mdash; 3.4 billion years more recently than this new record-holder. Even the oldest known supernovas, usually the brightest and most easily-spotted individual objects across the immensity of spacetime, are younger than Earendel.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23355186/hubbleicarusimage1stscihp1813am2000x1333.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="An image of Icarus, the previous record holder for the the farthest individual star ever seen. The left image shows the massive galaxy cluster that sits between Earth and Icarus. From NASA: “The panels at the right show the view in 2011, without Icarus visible, compared with the star’s brightening in 2016.” | NASA, ESA, and P. Kelly (University of Minnesota)" data-portal-copyright="NASA, ESA, and P. Kelly (University of Minnesota)" />
<p><strong>Seeing through the gravity lens</strong></p>

<p>Earendel&rsquo;s home galaxy, the Sunrise arc, takes its name from that gravitational lensing effect that made this discovery possible.</p>

<p>&ldquo;This galaxy appears magnified and stretched into a long, thin crescent shape due to the gravitational lensing effect of a massive cluster of galaxies in the foreground,&rdquo; said Brian Welch, a Johns Hopkins University astronomer and lead author of the <em>Nature</em> paper.</p>

<p>Welch told <em>The Verge</em> that he stumbled across Earendel while he was studying the gravitational lens itself.</p>

<p>Gravitational lenses, like magnifying glasses, tend to warp and twist images and have areas of higher and lower magnification. If you have a magnifying glass at home, the best magnification is likely<strong> </strong>at the center of a simple circle. Gravitational lenses are trickier to use.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>Gravitational lenses, like magnifying glasses, tend to warp and twist images and have areas of higher and lower magnification</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>In a gravitational lens, there&rsquo;s a line called the &ldquo;critical curve&rdquo; where the magnification is most intense. Objects seen through the lens get reflected across the critical curve, appearing multiple times. And the more closely they line up with the line of the curve from our perspective on Earth, the more magnified they get.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23355420/hubble_earendel_annotated.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="An annotated image showing Earendel in relation to the Sunrise arc | &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Science: NASA, ESA, Brian Welch (JHU), Dan Coe (STScI); Image processing: NASA, ESA, Alyssa Pagan (STScI)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;" data-portal-copyright="&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Science: NASA, ESA, Brian Welch (JHU), Dan Coe (STScI); Image processing: NASA, ESA, Alyssa Pagan (STScI)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;" />
<p>&ldquo;I was creating a model of the lensing effects of the galaxy cluster, with the goal of measuring the magnification of the Sunrise Arc,&rdquo; Welch said. &ldquo;The models kept predicting that this one bright point on the arc should have an extremely high magnification.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Welch realized that this bright point was an object very closely aligned with the critical curve &mdash; so close and so small that even Hubble&rsquo;s sharp eye resolved its doubled, reflected image across the line as a single smear. That proximity to the critical curve also meant that whatever it was, it had already been magnified somewhere between 1,000 and 40,000 times before reaching Hubble. However small and faint it appeared to Hubble, it was, in fact, much smaller &mdash; tiny on the scale of the Sunrise Arc galaxy.</p>

<p>&ldquo;As I looked into it more, I found that the source was too small to be anything other than an individual star (or binary system),&rdquo; Welch said.</p>

<p><strong>The ancient universe</strong></p>

<p>Welch and a large international team of coauthors spent three and a half years studying Earendel across multiple Hubble observations to confirm that they were seeing something real and not a transient effect of the light.</p>

<p>That time and effort was worth it, Welch said, because these very old stars can teach us things about the history of the universe.</p>

<p>&ldquo;With distant objects, we are seeing into the universe&rsquo;s past and into a time when the universe looked very different than it does today,&rdquo; Welch said. &ldquo;We know that galaxies look different at this early time, and we know that there have been relatively few generations of stars that came before.&rdquo;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>“With distant objects, we are seeing into the universe’s past and into a time when the universe looked very different than it does today.”</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>Stars are the factories of heavy elements in our universe, formed when lighter atoms like hydrogen and helium fuse together through nuclear fusion to form heavier material like carbon, oxygen, and even iron. Earendel, at that early stage in our universe&rsquo;s history, probably had very little material heavier than helium in its system, Welch said.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Studying this lensed star in detail gives us a new window into what stars in these early days were like and how they differ from stars in the nearby universe,&rdquo; Welch said.</p>

<p>The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), launched in December 2021, is currently gearing up for science operations. Its optics, sharper than Hubble&rsquo;s, should be able to confirm their conclusion that Earendel is a single star system and not a cluster of star systems lumped together, the authors wrote in the paper. They also hope to see whether Earendel was a solitary star or binary system, learn more about the star&rsquo;s temperature and mass, among other properties.&nbsp;</p>

<p>JWST will be busy making its way through a scientific wish list that has grown long in the years astronomers spent anticipating the launch, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/22789561/nasa-jwst-james-webb-space-telescope-priorities-astronomy-astrophysics-exoplanets">as<em> The Verge </em>previously reported</a>. That will include studying exoplanets as well as the ancient universe &mdash; including star systems like Earandel that glowed at the dawn of time.</p>

<p><em><strong>Update 12:07 PM ET:</strong> This article has been updated with an additional image of Earandel and the Sunrise arc. </em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Rafi Letzter</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[A teenager on TikTok disrupted thousands of scientific studies with a single video]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2021/9/24/22688278/tiktok-science-study-survey-prolific" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2021/9/24/22688278/tiktok-science-study-survey-prolific</id>
			<updated>2021-09-24T09:00:00-04:00</updated>
			<published>2021-09-24T09:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Creators" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Science" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="TikTok" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Thousands of scientific studies had to toss out weeks of data because of a 56-second TikTok video by a teenager. The July 23rd video is short and simple. It opens with recent Florida high school graduate and self-described &#8220;teen author&#8221; Sarah Frank sitting in her bedroom and smiling at the camera. &#8220;Welcome to side hustles [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Illustration by Alex Castro / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/18331847/acastro_190723_1777_tiktok_0001.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Thousands of scientific studies had to toss out weeks of data because of a 56-second TikTok video by a teenager.</p>

<p>The <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@sarahndom/video/6988270489290411269?lang=en&amp;is_copy_url=1&amp;is_from_webapp=v1">July 23rd video</a> is short and simple. It opens with recent Florida high school graduate and self-described &ldquo;teen author&rdquo; Sarah Frank sitting in her bedroom and smiling at the camera.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Welcome to side hustles I recommend trying &mdash; part one,&rdquo; she says in the video, pointing users to the website Prolific.co. &ldquo;Basically, it&rsquo;s a bunch of surveys for different amounts of money and different amounts of time.&rdquo;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-tiktok wp-block-embed-tiktok alignnone"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="tiktok-embed" cite="https://www.tiktok.com/@sarah.frank/video/6988270489290411269" data-video-id="6988270489290411269" data-embed-from="oembed"> <section> <a target="_blank" title="@sarah.frank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@sarah.frank?refer=embed">@sarah.frank</a> <p>i’m excited for this series!! <a title="sidehustles" target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/tag/sidehustles?refer=embed">#sidehustles</a> <a title="sarahssidehustles" target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/tag/sarahssidehustles?refer=embed">#sarahssidehustles</a> <a title="prolific" target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/tag/prolific?refer=embed">#prolific</a> <a title="makingmoney" target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/tag/makingmoney?refer=embed">#makingmoney</a> <a title="sidehustleideas" target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/tag/sidehustleideas?refer=embed">#sidehustleideas</a></p> <a target="_blank" title="♬ original sound - Sarah✨🫶🏼🦋" href="https://www.tiktok.com/music/original-sound-6988270314086419206?refer=embed">♬ original sound &#8211; Sarah✨🫶🏼🦋</a> </section> </blockquote> 
</div></figure>
<p>That video got 4.1 million views in the month after it was posted and sent tens of thousands of new users flooding to the Prolific platform. Prolific, a tool for scientists conducting behavioral research, had no free screening tools in place to make sure that it delivered representative population samples to each study. Suddenly, scientists used to getting a wide mix of subjects for their Prolific studies saw their surveys flooded with responses from young women around Frank&rsquo;s age.</p>

<p>For researchers who rely on representative samples of the US population, that demographic shift was a major problem with no obvious cause and no immediately clear way to fix.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="KOAnOS">Doing science on the internet</h2>
<p>Though not particularly well known, Prolific is part of a small collection of online tools that have transformed the way corporations and scientists study the way people think and act. The first and largest of these research platforms is Amazon-owned Mechanical Turk, which was released in 2005 as a general-purpose platform for crowdsourcing work on repetitive tasks. Soon after it was released, behavioral scientists realized its potential value for their research, and it quickly revolutionized several research fields.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Before Mechanical Turk existed, all social science research had to happen in the laboratory. You&rsquo;d need to bring in college sophomores and put them through questionnaires and surveys and whatnot,&rdquo; said Nicholas Hall, director of the Behavioral Lab at the Stanford School of Business.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>“Online research makes it so much easier. You program a survey&#8230; you put it online, and within a day, you have 1,000 responses.” </p></blockquote></figure>
<p>&ldquo;That&rsquo;s an enormous time- and labor-intensive endeavor. Online research makes it so much easier. You program a survey&#8230; you put it online, and within a day, you have 1,000 responses,&rdquo; Hall told <em>The Verge</em>. &ldquo;That changed the face of social science.&rdquo;</p>

<p>The Behavioral Lab at Stanford mainly uses the newer, smaller Prolific platform for online studies these days, Hall said. While many Mechanical Turk customers are big businesses conducting corporate research, Prolific gears its product to scientists.</p>

<p>The smaller platform offers more transparency, promises to treat survey participants more ethically, and promises higher-quality research subjects than alternative platforms like Mechanical Turk.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Scientists doing this sort of research in the United States generally want a pool of subjects who speak English as a first language, are not too practiced at taking psychological surveys, and together make up a reasonably representative demographic sample of the American population.</p>

<p>Prolific, most agreed, did a good job providing high-quality subjects. The sudden change in the platform&rsquo;s demographics threatened to upend that reputation.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="lFmKlc">TikTok aftermath</h2>
<p>In the days and weeks after Frank posted her video, researchers scrambled to figure out what was happening to their studies.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter alignnone"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-dnt="true"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Analyzing N=300 Prolific study. Very generic title &amp; description. Survey questions mostly about social comparisons &amp; money<br><br>91% of respondents are female, 7% are male. Don&#039;t think I&#039;ve miscoded anything, and no unusual survey restrictions.<br><br>How does that happen?</p>&mdash; Elliot Portakowski (@portakowski) <a href="https://twitter.com/portakowski/status/1423768044610854913?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 6, 2021</a></blockquote>
</div></figure>
<p>A member of the Stanford Behavioral Laboratory <a href="https://community.prolific.co/t/studies-80-90-women-age-21-could-be-from-viral-tiktok-about-prolific/4266">posted</a> on a Prolific forum, &ldquo;We have noticed a huge leap in the number of participants on the platform in the US Pool, from 40k to 80k. Which is great, however, now a lot of our studies have a gender skew where maybe 85% of participants are women. Plus the age has been averaging around 21.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Wayne State psychologist Hannah Schechter seems to have been the first person to crack the case.</p>

<p>&ldquo;This may be far-fetched,&rdquo; she tweeted, linking to Frank&rsquo;s video, &ldquo;but given the timing, virality of the video, and the user&rsquo;s follower demographics&#8230;.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Long-standing Prolific survey-takers <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ProlificAc/comments/oyff92/prolific_went_viral_on_tiktok/">complained on Reddit</a> that Frank had made it difficult to find paid surveys to take on the overrun platform.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Now it&rsquo;s just another bullshit site to spend hours and make pennies on,&rdquo; wrote one user, who said they had previously made $30 a week on the platform.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>“Now it’s just another bullshit site to spend hours and make pennies on.”</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>Frank, who &ldquo;guesstimated&rdquo; she had made a total of about $80 taking surveys on Prolific before her video, told <em>The Verge</em> she also noticed a difference on the platform.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Less studies have been available for me and everyone else,&rdquo; she told <em>The Verge</em>. &ldquo;I&rsquo;ve received some really mean comments accusing me of single-handedly ruining the site and being selfish &mdash; even though I received no compensation for that video.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p>She added that she hoped Prolific would be able to set up a system to deal with its changed demographics.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&ldquo;I also predict that a lot of people who signed up after seeing my video will forget about it, and the surge will die down,&rdquo; she said.</p>

<p>Prolific co-founder and CTO Phelim Bradley told <em>The Verge</em> that many of the new users do seem to be dropping off.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Prior to Tiktok, about 50% of the responses on our platform came from women,&rdquo; he wrote in an email. &ldquo;The surge knocked this up as high as 75% for a few days, but since then, this number has been trending down, and we&rsquo;re currently back to ~60% of responses being from women.&rdquo;</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22873438/2CC6A4E2_1910_45C9_9FF7_310DB9DA5B9C.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="A chart showing the increase in female users over time. | Courtesy of Prolific" data-portal-copyright="Courtesy of Prolific" />
<p>According to Bradley, about 4,600 studies were disrupted by Frank&rsquo;s TikTok, around a third of the total that were active on the platform during the surge. Of those, he said, the vast majority should be salvageable.</p>

<p>Prolific has refunded researchers whose studies were significantly impacted by the surge in women survey takers and introduced a new suite of demographic screening tools. The company announced these steps a month after Frank posted her video. The company has now re-organized, putting a team in charge of demographic balancing in order to more quickly recognize and respond to this sort of problem in the future.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Honestly, we were somewhat caught by surprise, and we didn&rsquo;t predict how large the impact was going to be,&rdquo; Bradley said.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>“Young women who enjoy TikTok are people too.”</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>The surge isn&rsquo;t all bad. Refreshing the pool of survey takers probably has long-term benefits, says Vlad Chituk, a Yale graduate student in psychology who was running several pilot studies on Prolific when the surge hit. When subjects take lots of psychological surveys, they learn the tricks scientists use to gather data, and that can impact the way they respond to future survey questions. Fresh subjects provide higher-quality data.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Young women who enjoy TikTok are people too,&rdquo; he said.</p>

<p>As for Frank, she says that her side hustle video is now the most popular TikTok she&rsquo;s ever posted.</p>

<p>&ldquo;It definitely didn&rsquo;t occur to me that the video would blow up. I just posted it for my friends and followers, not for the reach it ended up getting,&rdquo; she said. &ldquo;I think it blew up because the site is genuinely so cool, and people love efficient ways to make money.&rdquo;</p>

<p class="has-end-mark">For the time being, Frank has paused most of her own side hustles as she settles into her freshman year at Brown.</p>

<p><em><strong>Correction 9/27</strong>: A source at Prolific originally said that the company didn&rsquo;t have demographic balancing in place in July. He informed us after publication that they did have a gender screening tool available for a fee at the time. </em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
