<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Camera Reviews | The Verge</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.</subtitle>

	<updated>2026-04-11T13:02:43+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/camera-review" />
	<id>https://www.theverge.com/rss/camera-review/index.xml</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.theverge.com/rss/camera-review/index.xml" />

	<icon>https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&amp;h=150&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Antonio G. Di Benedetto</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Allow me to explain why I love this camera that can’t shoot color]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/910061/ricoh-gr-iv-monochrome-review" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=910061</id>
			<updated>2026-04-11T09:02:43-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-04-12T07:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Cameras" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Gadgets" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[I love black-and-white photography. I also adore compact cameras you can always have by your side. So I'm a total mark for the Ricoh GR IV Monochrome, a fixed-lens camera that can't zoom and can't record color - at all. It's a formula that makes the average person ask, "Why?" I've tested the GR IV [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="A Ricoh GR IV Monochrome camera resting on a black-and-white gradient mat with geometric shapes." data-caption="No frills, all artsy thrills. | Photo: Antonio G. Di Benedetto / The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Antonio G. Di Benedetto / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/04/268451_Ricoh_GR_IV_Monochrome_review_ADiBenedetto_0001.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	No frills, all artsy thrills. | Photo: Antonio G. Di Benedetto / The Verge	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-drop-cap has-text-align-none">I love black-and-white photography. I also adore compact cameras you can always have by your side. So I'm a total mark for the Ricoh GR IV Monochrome, a fixed-lens camera that can't zoom and can't record color - at all. It's a formula that makes the average person ask, "Why?" </p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">I've tested the GR IV Monochrome for over a month, taking it with me everywhere and photographing everything. Let me explain how this pricey little point-and-shoot is likely to go down as one of my all-time-favorite cameras.</p>
<div class="product-block"><h3>Ricoh GR IV Monochrome</h3>
<figure class="product-image"><img width="300" height="200" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/04/268451_Ricoh_GR_IV_Monochrome_review_ADiBenedetto_0003.jpg?w=300" class="attachment-medium size-medium" alt=""></figure>
<div class="product-scores"><h4>Score: 8</h4><table class="product-pros-cons"><thead><tr><th>Pros</th><th>Cons</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><ul><li>Excellent black-and-white image quality</li><li>Everything great about the standard GR IV: sharp lens, small size, …</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/910061/ricoh-gr-iv-monochrome-review">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Sheena Vasani</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The best instant cameras you can buy right now]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/23133103/best-instant-cameras-fujifilm-polaroid-kodak" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/23133103/best-instant-cameras-fujifilm-polaroid-kodak</id>
			<updated>2026-02-27T19:32:16-05:00</updated>
			<published>2026-02-27T19:32:11-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Buying Guides" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Cameras" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Gadgets" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Verge Shopping" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Even with the ability to take excellent photos with our phones and instantly share them across the world, there’s something magical about the old-school instant camera. With just a click of a button, you can capture a moment in a photo that you can see and touch almost immediately. Images captured by an instant camera [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Image: Kristen Radtke / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24859242/236751_Instant_Camera_Buying_Guide.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Even with the ability to take excellent photos with our phones and instantly share them across the world, there’s something magical about the old-school instant camera. With just a click of a button, you can capture a moment in a photo that you can see and touch almost immediately. Images captured by an instant camera aren’t as pristine or perfect as those produced by modern digital cameras, but their soft images and imperfections are often a big part of the allure.</p>

<p>Yet not all instant cameras are the same, and some of them are better suited for different needs and budgets. That’s why we tested some of the most popular instant cameras on the market from brands like Fujifilm, Polaroid, Leica, Canon, Kodak, and others.</p>

<p>All the models featured in our instant camera buying guide are enjoyable to use, but each offers a distinct set of features at a different price point. As a result, some are more appropriate for a child or budding photographer, while others are more advanced and provide added creative control (for a price). When it comes down to it, though, we consider print quality, ease of use, and affordability to be the hallmarks of a quality shooter. That’s why we picked <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BWNZLQ69/">Fujifilm’s Instax Mini 12</a> as the best instant camera for most people, as it ticks all three boxes wonderfully.</p>

<hr class="wp-block-separator has-css-opacity" />

<p>If you’re looking for more creative control or features like filters, however, the <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-Instax-Mini-Instant-Camera/dp/B0C6D6GL2Q/">Instax Mini Evo</a> is our choice, one that offers great image quality and lets you choose which photos you’d like to print. Other instant cameras, like <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Portable-Compatible-Bluetooth-Technology-Laminated/dp/B084MKQV4N/">Kodak’s Mini Retro 3</a>, also offer a variety of advanced creative modes for those who desire more.</p>

<p>Take a look at this list of our instant camera recommendations to find the best fit for you.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="kfGfOn">The best instant camera for most people</h2>
<div class="product-block"><h3>Fujifilm Instax Mini 12</h3>
<figure class="product-image"><img width="300" height="200" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24545175/236588_Fujifilm_Instax_Mini_12_SVasani_0001.jpg?w=300" class="attachment-medium size-medium" alt="A hand holding up the white Fujifilm Instax Mini 12 against a green slide." /></figure>
<div class="product-scores"><h4>Score: 8</h4><table class="product-pros-cons"><thead><tr><th>Pros</th><th>Cons</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><ul><li>Produces relatively true-to-life photos</li><li>Terrific ease of use</li><li>Very affordable</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Instax film can get pricey</li><li>Minimal creative control</li><li>Flash can be overpowering</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
<h3>Where to Buy:</h3><ul><li><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BWNZLQ69/"> <strike>$93.95</strike> $86.24 at <strong>Amazon</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.walmart.com/ip/FUJIFILM-INSTAX-MINI-12-Instant-Film-Camera-Clay-White/2592237811"> <strike>$93.95</strike> $93 at <strong>Walmart</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/site/fujifilm-instax-mini-12-instant-film-camera-white/6536334.p"> $93.99 at <strong>Best Buy</strong></a></li></ul></div>
<p><em><em><strong>Film type: </strong>Fujifilm Instax Mini film (sold separately)</em> <em>/ <strong>Film size:</strong> 2 x 3-inches /</em></em> <em><em><strong>Weight: </strong>306 grams<strong> </strong>/ <strong>Charging method: </strong>AA batteries<strong> </strong>/<strong> Companion app: </strong>None<strong> </strong>/ <strong>Other features:</strong> Built-in selfie mirror, film counter</em></em></p>

<p>If all you’re looking to do is just click a button and get a decent print for a reasonable price, we recommend Fujifilm’s Instax Mini 12. It’s a basic instant camera that’s similar to our former pick, the Instax Mini 11, but with some minor updates. It still takes less than five minutes to start shooting, but the setup process is easier since all you need to do is twist the lens to either “on” or “off.” Such ease of use, combined with the camera’s thinner build, makes it particularly well-suited for kids and those new to photography.</p>

<p>For an instant camera, image quality is also better than most of the other cameras I tested, producing relatively true-to-life photos. Most struggle to capture low-light conditions well, and this one is no exception, but the built-in flash helps. Fujifilm claims the Mini 12 optimizes image quality in both bright and dark environments better than its predecessor, but I didn’t notice much of a difference. The flash — which you can’t disable — is also still overpowering in some instances, resulting in a few overexposed images. Photos actually seemed a little darker and less vivid than before, but selfies captured my features and skin tone more accurately, thanks in part to the small front-facing mirror. The updated lens design also lets you twist into Close-Up Mode to zoom slightly and activate the Parallax Correction features for a more aligned photo. It’s a fun, point-and-shoot-style feature, though aligning photos still takes some practice (as well as some composition guidance from the manual).</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24545177/236588_Fujifilm_Instax_Mini_12_SVasani_0003.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Fujifilm Instax Mini 12 photos of animals, nature, art, and drinks." title="Fujifilm Instax Mini 12 photos of animals, nature, art, and drinks." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;For an instant camera, Fujifilm’s Instax Mini 12 produces vivid, relatively true-to-life photos.&lt;/em&gt; | Image: Sheena Vasani / The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Image: Sheena Vasani / The Verge" />
<p>The Mini 12 also offers a number of other niceties. I appreciated the larger-than-average viewfinder and the small counter that shows your remaining shots, which is a useful tracking feature given that each print costs about $1. However, it doesn’t support Bluetooth or pair with a companion app that allows you to edit photos (only scan them), and it doesn’t feature filters, lens options, or portrait modes. But if you’re looking for a solid instant camera that caters to all ages and experience levels, you’ll likely be satisfied with the Instax Mini 12.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="fSDErJ">The best premium instant camera</h2>
<div class="product-block"><h3>Fujifilm Instax Mini Evo</h3>
<figure class="product-image"><img width="300" height="200" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23350933/BFARSACE_220328_5108_1.jpg?w=300" class="attachment-medium size-medium" alt="The Instax Mini Evo being held up with a hand against a dark background with cameras that are out of focus." /></figure>
<div class="product-scores"><h4>Score: 8</h4><table class="product-pros-cons"><thead><tr><th>Pros</th><th>Cons</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><ul><li>Great use of dials and buttons</li><li>Lots of printing flexibility</li><li>Good battery life</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Internal storage is limited</li><li>Micro USB port is annoying</li><li>No viewfinder</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
<h3>Where to Buy:</h3><ul><li><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-Instax-Mini-Instant-Camera/dp/B09M4DKBQ9/"> <strike>$234</strike> $229 at <strong>Amazon</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.walmart.com/ip/instax-mini-Evo-Instant-Digital-Camera-Black/367663480"> $234 at <strong>Walmart</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/site/fujifilm-instax-mini-evo-instant-film-camera-black/6494388.p"> $234.99 at <strong>Best Buy</strong></a></li></ul></div>
<p><em><em><strong>Film type: </strong>Fujifilm Instax Mini film (sold separately)</em> <em>/ <strong>Film size:</strong> 2 x 3-inches /</em></em> <em><em><strong>Weight: </strong>285 grams<strong> </strong>/ <strong>Charging method: </strong>USB-C (on newer models) /<strong> Companion app: </strong>Yes<strong> </strong>/ <strong>Other features:</strong> LCD screen, smartphone printing</em></em></p>

<p>One of Fujifilm’s Instax Mini Evo was a favorite of <a href="https://www.theverge.com/22989946/fujifilm-instax-mini-evo-instant-camera-review-test-photography">my former colleague Becca Farcase</a> — and it’s mine as well. A hybrid camera that bears a resemblance to Fujifilm’s more expensive Fujifilm X100 line of cameras, it looks good and boasts vintage dials and buttons so stylish that they even caught the attention of passersby as I walked around Los Angeles taking photos. I tested the black camera, but Fujifilm also sells a handsome brown version, as well as a newer pink model.</p>

<p>It’s easy to balk at its price tag, but this camera offers a level of flexibility that could save you money in the long run if you use it a lot. That’s because the Instax Mini Evo includes a full-color three-inch LCD screen that lets you preview and select which images you want to print, which can help you avoid wasting film on unwanted shots. The added flexibility gave me more room for creative experimentation, too, as I wasn’t worried about running out of film. I also loved using the Instax Mini Evo app to print photos from my smartphone. Plus, unlike the Instax Mini 12, the Evo now uses a USB-C port (though older black models still use the Micro USB port) for charging, so you don’t need to keep buying new batteries.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23601818/svasani_220525_5251_0009.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="The Instax Mini Evo resting on a table surrounded by photos it’s produced." title="The Instax Mini Evo resting on a table surrounded by photos it’s produced." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;Being able to adjust the brightness of the prints helped me capture night photos and a low-light immersive exhibit a little more clearly and realistically, which is a feature the Instax Mini 12 doesn’t offer.&lt;/em&gt; | Image: Sheena Vasani / The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Image: Sheena Vasani / The Verge" />
<p>Unlike the Mini 12, the Evo comes with a few extra features that can help you capture better photos. For example, you can disable the flash, leverage the 3-inch LCD screen as a viewfinder, and adjust the brightness of a print  — a helpful feature, given Evo doesn’t capture dark environments well. The camera’s dials also let you apply various lens options and effects, from retro filters to monochrome shades, and you can even take app-based remote shots, allowing for better seflies and more photographic control.</p>

<p>The Evo isn’t perfect, though. The companion app isn’t as feature-rich as competing software, the menu system can be confusing to navigate, and the camera’s internal storage maxes out at 45 images. Still, these are relatively minor drawbacks for a stylish, portable camera that makes it easy to quickly capture and print quality shots.</p>

<h5 class="wp-block-heading" id="di2Ydc"><a href="https://www.theverge.com/22989946/fujifilm-instax-mini-evo-instant-camera-review-test-photography"><strong>Read our full Fujifilm Instax Mini Evo review</strong></a>.</h5>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="aLU8Kl">The best instant camera for social occasions</h2>
<div class="product-block"><h3>Kodak Mini Shot 3 Retro</h3>
<figure class="product-image"><img loading="lazy" width="300" height="224" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23611271/svasani_KodakMiniRetro3cropped.jpb.png?w=300" class="attachment-medium size-medium" alt="" /></figure>
<div class="product-scores"><h4>Score: 6</h4><table class="product-pros-cons"><thead><tr><th>Pros</th><th>Cons</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><ul><li>Lets you print photos from your phone</li><li>Entertaining companion app</li><li>Comes with film</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>So-so image quality </li><li>Unable to store images</li><li>Not as stylish as the Instax Mini Evo</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
<h3>Where to Buy:</h3><ul><li><a href="https://www.walmart.com/ip/KODAK-Mini-Shot-3-Retro-4PASS-2-in-1-Instant-Camera-and-Photo-Printer-3x3-inches-8-Sheets-Yellow/373093173"> <strike>$169.99</strike> $154.99 at <strong>Walmart (with eight sheets)</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Portable-Compatible-Bluetooth-Technology-Laminated/dp/B084MKQV4N/"> <strike>$169.99</strike> $154.99 at <strong>Amazon (with eight sheets)</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://kodakphotoprinter.com/products/best-instant-camera-kodak-mini-shot-3-retro"> <strike>$169.99</strike> $159.99 at <strong>Kodak (with eight sheets)</strong></a></li></ul></div>
<p><em><em><strong>Film type: </strong>Kodak Instant Print 3 x 3-inch cartridge (included) / <strong>Film size: </strong>3 x 3-inch square prints / <strong>Weight: </strong>467 grams / <strong>Charging method: </strong>Micro USB /<strong> Companion app: </strong>Yes<strong> </strong>/<strong> Other features:</strong> LCD screen, smartphone printing</em></em></p>

<p>Whereas the Instax Mini Evo’s companion app is more functional, Kodak’s hybrid Mini Shot 3 Retro is all about fun. The camera’s accompanying mobile app lets you apply frames, stickers, filters, and a wide range of customization options to photos, making it great for scrapbooking. There’s even a beauty feature in the app to conceal blemishes, as well as a set of Snapchat-like filters you can use to add, say, dog ears, making it a fun instant camera to use as a mini photo booth of sorts at parties.</p>

<p>Like the Evo, the Shot 3 Retro features an LCD screen — albeit a much smaller one — that lets you decide whether to print a shot. It also supports Bluetooth, and you can use the Kodak Photo Printer app to upload photos to social media or print decent, relatively crisp images from your phone. Unlike the Evo, however, the Shot 3 Retro retails for around $170 and includes a pack of film. It also uses cheaper film; you can often <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Kodak-4PASS-Cartridge-Ribbon-Refill/dp/B084MKLY8D/">pick up a 60-sheet cartridge for under $20</a>. The cheaper arguably encourages creative experimentation, even if the large 3 x 3-inch square prints feel lower in quality and more flimsy than those from both Fujifilm and Polaroid.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23601823/svasani_220525_5251_0014.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Two photos produced by the Kodak Mini Shot 3 that are relatively true-to-life but too oversaturated with a pink tint." title="Two photos produced by the Kodak Mini Shot 3 that are relatively true-to-life but too oversaturated with a pink tint." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;Photos taken with the Kodak Mini Shot 3 aren’t particularly sharp and can have an excessive pink tint.&lt;/em&gt; | Image: Sheena Vasani / The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Image: Sheena Vasani / The Verge" />
<p>However, there are notable drawbacks to the Shot 3 Retro. The resulting prints aren’t nearly as crisp or clear as those taken with a smartphone, for one, nor were they as clear or sharp as what you might get with the Evo or Mini 12 (some even have an excessive pink tint). The Shot 3 Retro doesn’t store images the way the Evo does, either, which means you can’t decide whether you’d like to print them later. It’s also noticeably heavier than the Evo and, frankly, nowhere near as stylish. Nonetheless, if you don’t mind compromising on photo quality and want a relatively affordable hybrid camera with fun app features, the Shot 3 Retro is a good choice.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="W8F3oS">The best instant camera for retro fans</h2>
<div class="product-block"><h3>Polaroid Flip</h3>
<div class="product-description">The Polaroid Flip is a great instant camera for retro fans that prints vintage-style photos and offers modern conveniences like USB-C. It also features a variety of creative modes via the companion app, making it a solid choice for artistic photography as well. </div>
<figure class="product-image"><img loading="lazy" width="300" height="200" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/257953_Polaroid_Flip_AKrales_0007.jpg?w=300" class="attachment-medium size-medium" alt="" /></figure>
<div class="product-scores"><h4>Score: 7</h4><table class="product-pros-cons"><thead><tr><th>Pros</th><th>Cons</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><ul><li>Attractive, retro design</li><li>Prints dreamy, vintage-style photos that are relatively sharp for a Polaroid photo</li><li>Several creative modes</li><li>USB-C</li><li></li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Struggles in low light</li><li>Film takes up to 15 minutes to develop</li><li>Bulky and relatively heavy</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
<h3>Where to Buy:</h3><ul><li><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Polaroid-Instant-Camera-Autofocus-Design/dp/B0F99646RJ/"> <strike>$219.99</strike> $213.14 at <strong>Amazon</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.polaroid.com/en_us/products/flip-polaroid-camera/white"> $219.99 at <strong>Polaroid</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/product/polaroid-flip-instant-camera-black/BYK355WZJ3/sku/6625944?extStoreId=1510&#038;utm_source=feed&#038;ref=212&#038;loc=19738180311&#038;gclsrc=aw.ds&#038;gad_source=1&#038;gad_campaignid=19746875998&#038;gbraid=0AAAAAD-ORIhLkQBCrX-i8BOI297pcjyxQ&#038;gclid=Cj0KCQjwrc7GBhCfARIsAHGcW5VaYUUD3CkIu5tOK8dt5upeZ1EF1qzchA4wCZcT2tpLZ7370Z0TOC4aAho9EALw_wcB"> $219.99 at <strong>Best Buy</strong></a></li></ul></div>
<p class="has-text-align-none"><em><strong>Film type:</strong>&nbsp;Polaroid i-Type Color Film (sold separately) /&nbsp;<strong>Film size:</strong>&nbsp;4.2 x 3.5-inch prints /&nbsp;<strong>Weight:</strong>&nbsp;648 grams /&nbsp;<strong>Charging method:</strong>&nbsp;USB-C /&nbsp;<strong>Companion app:</strong>&nbsp;Yes /&nbsp;<strong>Other features:&nbsp;</strong>Flip-up lid, scene analysis feature</em></p>

<p>If you’re looking for an instant camera that offers the most old-fashioned, instant-film experience, the Polaroid Flip is the camera for you. It resembles vintage instant cameras like the Polaroid 600 more than any other camera on our list, thanks to its classic, retro-inspired design and flip-up lid. Its square I-Type film prints and iconic white frame give photos an authentically vintage look, while modern touches like Bluetooth, USB-C charging, and a beginner-friendly companion app add greater convenience and creative control.</p>

<p>Compared to the <a href="https://www.polaroid.com/en_us/products/now-plus-polaroid-camera">third-gen Polaroid Now Plus</a>, my former retro pick, the Flip delivers clearer shots with fewer wasted photos, making the extra $50 worthwhile given that eight I-Type sheets <a href="https://www.polaroid.com/en_us/products/color-itype-instant-film">are a spendy $18.99</a>. The increased clarity can be attributed to several factors, including the Flip’s sonar autofocus and a four-lens hyperfocal system — which result in sharper, more focused images — along with its excellent flash. It’s the most powerful of any Polaroid camera, and while it can sometimes overexpose images, you can adjust exposure directly from the camera or app. The Scene Analysis feature also helps by warning if a shot is likely to be over- or underexposed, or if you’re too close to your subject. In my experience, the warnings didn’t always prevent overexposure, but they did leave me with shots that looked less blown than those from the Now Plus.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/257953_Polaroid_Flip_SVasani_0078.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;A few outdoor examples I captured with the Polaroid Flip.&lt;/em&gt; | Image: Sheena Vasani / The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Image: Sheena Vasani / The Verge" />
<p>All that being said, there are some notable drawbacks. The Flip is relatively heavy and awkwardly sized, so you can’t slip it into a purse or easily carry it around. Prints also take up to 15 minutes to develop — during which they must be shielded from light — which can be quite an inconvenience. Low-light performance remains a weak spot as well, and I struggled to capture indoor shots given the contrast and saturation are lower than with Instax film. Admittedly, this gave my pictures a more dreamy, vintage look that felt artistic, and you can use the Polaroid Lab to slightly adjust the saturation and exposure settings.</p>

<p>Truth be told, you could argue that many of these shortcomings are typical of a retro Polaroid-inspired instant camera and, thus, part of the experience. If that’s what you’re looking for, the Flip is the perfect camera for you.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The best instant camera for portability</h2>
<div class="product-block"><h3>Polaroid Go (second-gen)</h3>
<figure class="product-image"><img loading="lazy" width="300" height="200" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25382125/247082_Polaroid_Go_2_SVasani_0001.jpg?w=300" class="attachment-medium size-medium" alt="" /></figure>
<div class="product-scores"><h4>Score: 7</h4><table class="product-pros-cons"><thead><tr><th>Pros</th><th>Cons</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><ul><li>Tiny and lightweight</li><li>Prints vintage-like photos just like the Polaroid Flip</li><li>USB-C charging</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Struggles in low light</li><li>Film takes up to 15 minutes to develop</li><li>No Bluetooth support or companion app</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
<h3>Where to Buy:</h3><ul><li><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Polaroid-Go-Generation-Instant-Included/dp/B0CG7JG7N3/"> <strike>$89.99</strike> $79.95 at <strong>Amazon</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/site/polaroid-go-generation-2-white/6562510.p"> $89.99 at <strong>Best Buy </strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.polaroid.com/en_us/products/go-polaroid-camera"> $89.99 at <strong>Polaroid</strong></a></li></ul></div>
<p><em><em><strong>Film type:</strong> Polaroid i-Type Color Film (sold separately) /<strong> Film size: </strong>2.6 x 2.1-inch prints / <strong>Weight:</strong> 239 grams / <strong>Charging method:</strong> USB-C / <strong>Companion app:</strong> No / <strong>Other features: </strong>Self-timer, selfie mirror, film counter</em></em></p>

<p>Whereas the Flip is huge, the second-gen Polaroid Go is tiny. It weighs just over a pound and fits easily in the palm of my hand — which is saying a lot, given I’m petite and a little over five feet tall — making it the most portable instant camera on our list. If its images were more true to life and didn’t require you to sheild them from the light for about 15 minutes while developing, I’d call it the best instant camera for kids or travel.</p>

<p>At $89.99, the latest Go is the most affordable Polaroid camera available, with film that costs just a little more than Fujifilm’s Instax Mini shots (<a href="https://www.polaroid.com/en_us/products/color-go-instant-film" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a 16-sheet pack runs $21.99</a>). The new Go sports a few upgrades over the last-gen model, including USB-C support, and Polaroid claims the camera produces clearer stills than its predecessor. Photos are slightly brighter, though the original Go produced warmer images that felt more true to life. Still, the photos are charming in the way only a Polaroid photo can be. Contrast and color saturation levels are still low, but in a way that exudes the vintage, almost dreamy look of the photos taken with the Flip.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25382128/247082_Polaroid_Go_2_SVasani_0004.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;The second-gen Polaroid Go produces charming photos but with a cooler tone.&lt;/em&gt; | Photo by Sheena Vasani / The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo by Sheena Vasani / The Verge" />
<p>Unlike the Flip, the Go lacks creative modes and more advanced features. Instead, it’s just a simple point-and-shoot camera, just like the Mini 12, which makes it a little easier to use. There’s no Bluetooth or companion app for added effects; however, the camera does include a self-timer and a larger selfie mirror. The smaller prints may disappoint those who prefer traditional Polaroid sizes, though, and its modern design lacks the retro charm of older models. But classic Polaroid cameras didn’t come with an app, either, and the Go’s simplicity makes it an a easy-to-use option that delivers a traditional instant film experience at less than half the price of the Flip.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="SYcVqE">Other instant cameras to consider</h2>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading has-text-align-none" id="instax-mini-41"><a href="https://instax.com/mini41/en/">Instax Mini 41</a></h3>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Fujifilm’s <a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/product/fujifilm-instax-mini-41-instant-film-camera-black/J7929VC9XS/sku/6621550">$116.99 Instax Mini 41</a> is the long-awaited follow-up to the <a href="https://www.theverge.com/22367999/fujifilm-instax-mini-40-review-price">Mini 40</a>. The updated model retains the retro design found on the prior model but introduces parallax correction, a feature borrowed from the Instax Mini 12 to help users avoid off-center shots when taking close-ups. It didn’t take long testing the Mini 41 for me to realize it’s simply the Mini 12 for adults. With its black-and-silver body and flatter, squarer edges, the Mini 41 looks sleeker and more stylish. The two cameras are nearly identical, aside from the design, with the same solid photo quality and feature set. Both battery-powered options turn on with a simple twist of the lens, and each comes equipped with a selfie mirror, a close-up mode, and a flash (which cannot be disabled).</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">There are a few subtle upgrades to the Mini 41, however. A textured grip in the front makes it easier to hold, and its shape makes shooting in landscape mode more comfortable. But those are small differences, and at their core, the cameras offer the same experience. Since the Instax Mini 12 retails for less, I ultimately believe it’s the better value; however, if a fashionable, mature look appeals to you, the Mini 41 is a great alternative, especially if you can find it on sale.</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="dmcgAS"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-Instax-Mini-Instant-Camera/dp/B0CXZQGL2D/">Instax Mini 99</a></h3>

<p>If you’re looking for an advanced analog instant camera, Fujifilm’s Instax Mini 99 is one to consider. At <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-Instax-Mini-Instant-Camera/dp/B0CXZQGL2D/">$234.95</a>, Fujifilm’s latest instant camera is not as affordable as the Instax Mini 12 or the Mini 41, but it’s certainly a step up from the one-button point-and-click cameras given it has multiple brightness settings, focus zones, color effects, and even two shutter buttons for greater creative control. The camera even comes with a tripod socket, an aluminum extension column, and a Sports Mode designed to further reduce blur when capturing fast-moving subjects.</p>

<p>Thanks to the added level of customization, I was able to capture higher-quality photos that looked truer to life than those from the Instax Mini 12, Mini 41, and Mini Evo. Granted, the Mini 99 is an analog camera, not a hybrid like the Evo, so you shouldn’t buy it if you also want to print smartphone photos. The newer model is also less user-friendly than the Mini 12 and Mini 41, so I wouldn’t recommend it for young children. Still, for an advanced analog instant camera, it’s relatively easy to set up and use, rendering it as much fun for budding photographers as more experienced shooters.&nbsp;</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="kodak-smile-plus"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/KODAK-Effect-Changing-Sticky-Backed-Technology-Compatible/dp/B0CQMLV5S6/">Kodak Smile Plus</a></h3>

<p>The <a href="https://www.amazon.com/KODAK-Effect-Changing-Sticky-Backed-Technology-Compatible/dp/B0BP99TP48/">Kodak Smile Plus</a> is another hybrid instant camera that allows you to print smartphone photos. It’s smaller and less expensive than Kodak’s Mini Shot 3 Retro 3 at $129.99, and it’s available in a variety of vibrant colors that should appeal to children. It also comes with a physical filter-changing lens and prints on Zinc paper, allowing you to use your photos as stickers. </p>

<p>However, it lacks a built-in display, so you can’t choose which images you want to print directly on the camera itself. This often results in more wasted shots, especially since image quality is so-so at best, even when compared to those of the Retro 3. Photos are nowhere near as clear as the Instax Mini 12’s, either, especially in areas that are either too bright or too dark. </p>

<p>That said, the Smile Plus does offer a microSD card slot, so you can store and view photos elsewhere. It pairs with an app similar to the Retro 3’s as well, and although the software isn&#8217;t as snappy or feature-rich, it still lets you add a variety of filters and frames. Ultimately, I’d recommend the Retro 3 since it&#8217;s often available for less than $120, but the Smile Plus is a good, budget-friendly alternative.</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="pJsALN"><a href="https://leicacamerausa.com/leica-sofort-2-white.html">Leica Sofort 2</a></h3>

<p>From photo quality to the lever you pull to print photos, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/5/23902287/leica-sofort-2-instant-film-camera">Leica’s Sofort 2</a> is a terrific camera that’s remarkably similar to the Instax Mini Evo. In all of my tests, the photos I took with both looked identical. The two hybrid cameras also print smartphone photos via Instax Mini film and offer 10 film and lens effects, along with a macro mode for those who want more creative control. The Sofort 2’s minimalistic look is stylish, too, even if it’s not as charming as the retro-inspired Evo.</p>

<p>The drawback to the Sofort 2 is that it’s twice the price of the Evo. It’s challenging to recommend <a href="https://leicacamerausa.com/leica-sofort-2-white.html">at $399</a>, as most people would likely consider the differences between the two cameras relatively minor. The Leica user interface is easier to navigate, though, and I appreciate the included lens cap and extended two-year warranty. I also appreciate that it lets you print photos taken with other Leica cameras via the companion app — a nice perk for Leica fans. Nonetheless, I don’t think those perks are enough to justify spending nearly $200 more.</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="Ugwaku"><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1775648-REG/fujifilm_16802814_instax_square_sq40.html">Instax Square SQ1</a></h3>

<p>While it didn’t make the cut, the <a href="https://www.theverge.com/21431103/fujifilm-instax-square-sq1-instant-camera-review-price-specs-features">Instax Square SQ1</a> is also worth a brief mention. Like the Mini 12, the Square SQ1 produces good-quality shots, is easy to set up and use, and features a built-in selfie mirror. The reason we didn’t include it above, however, is that it costs nearly twice as much as the Mini 12 at <a href="https://www.instaxus.com/cameras/instax-square-sq1/">$159.95</a>, though we do sometimes see it on sale for $100. That said, it might be worth a look if you prefer large 2.4 x 2.4-inch square prints and relatively true-to-life photos over vintage-looking stills. After all, the SQ1 is still cheaper than the Polaroid Flip and produces higher-quality images than the Kodak Mini Shot 3 Square Retro, which also prints similarly sized square shots.</p>

<p>Fujifilm also sells the newer <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/14/23759847/fujifilms-instax-square-lineup-just-got-a-lot-more-retro">Instax Square SQ40</a>. It’s similar to the Instax Square SQ1 but with a vintage look that’s more visually striking, yet it’s also more expensive at <a href="https://www.instaxus.com/cameras/instax-square-sq40/">$199.95</a>. Given it produces similarly good-quality photos, I’d recommend the Instax Square SQ1 or the more capable Instax Mini Evo for $50 more.</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="instax-wide-evo-hybrid"><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1875107-REG/fujifilm_16840957_instax_wide_evo_instant.html">Instax Wide Evo Hybrid</a></h3>

<p>Fujifilm’s <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/21/24348502/fujifilm-instax-wide-evo-hybrid-instant-camera-photography-printer">Instax Wide Evo Hybrid</a> is nearly identical to the <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/17/22786676/fujifilm-instax-mini-evo-announced-price-release-date">Instax Mini Evo</a>. You can use it to print photos directly from your smartphone, though the $409.95 camera also comes with a 15.67mm lens — the widest used on any Instax camera — for taking wide-format pictures. Ultimately, I preferred the smaller, more travel-friendly Mini Evo, but if you’re into wide prints (and don’t mind spending twice as much), the Wide Evo Hybrid is rather fun. The photo quality is solid and on par with both the Instax Mini Evo and Instax Mini 12. The main difference is that the Wide Evo’s lens captures a broader field of view. It also offers a few additional lenses and film effects, giving users a bit more creative control. I especially liked the Degree Control feature, which lets you fine-tune the intensity of each lens effect applied to your image.</p>

<p>Plus, unlike the Wide 400, the Wide Evo Hybrid is a hybrid camera with an LCD screen — a helpful feature that can reduce wasted shots. However, at $409.95, it costs significantly more than both the Mini Evo and the Wide 400. My other main complaint is that there’s a slight delay between pressing the shutter and the photo being taken, which is something I didn’t notice with the Mini Evo. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it can be frustrating when trying to capture fast-moving subjects, such as a dog or hyperactive toddler.</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading has-text-align-none" id="instax-wide-400"><a href="https://www.target.com/p/fujifilm-instax-wide-400-green-instant-camera/-/A-91347440">Instax Wide 400</a></h3>

<p class="has-text-align-none">If you’re into wide-format instant cameras but don’t want to spend $409.95 — or prefer a more traditional analog experience — the $175.95 <a href="https://www.instaxus.com/cameras/instax-wide-400-instant-camera/">Instax Wide 400</a> is a solid pick. The basic point-and-shoot produces similar stills to the Wide Evo, and in some ways, it’s easier to use, thanks to its stripped-down feature set. That simplicity, however, comes at the cost of customization, making it harder to capture the perfect shot. It also swaps an LCD display for a large viewfinder and is noticeably heavier than the Instax Mini Evo. Nonetheless, if you’re after wide prints at a more affordable price, it’s a worthwhile option.</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading has-text-align-none"><a href="https://www.instaxus.com/cameras/mini-liplay-plus/">Fujifilm Instax Mini LiPlay Plus</a></h3>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Fujifilm’s new Instax Mini LiPlay Plus isn’t nearly as stylish as the Instax Mini Evo, but it’s worth considering if you take a lot of selfies. <a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/product/fujifilm-instax-mini-liplay-instant-camera-midnight-blue/J7929VCRXW/sku/6663780/">At $234.99</a>, the hybrid camera costs the same as the Instax Mini Evo, but features a 3-inch LCD screen on the back, along with a second, rear-facing wide-angle lens designed specifically for self-portraits. That dedicated selfie camera, paired with the LCD, delivers some of the best — and most precise — selfies I’ve captured with an instant camera to date.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The LiPlay Plus also includes some fun extra features, such as a layered photo mode that combines images from both cameras into a single shot. It can also record short audio clips, which are saved as a QR code you can place in a corner of the printed photo. Both features are enjoyable to play with, though the layered photo mode can, admittedly, come off as gimmicky. You’re basically just dropping a selfie onto a background image with no way to reposition or resize it.</p>

<p><em><strong>Update, February 27th:</strong> Updated to reflect current pricing / availability</em> <em>and shorten the copy for all of our main entries. </em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Antonio G. Di Benedetto</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Retro camera shootout: Camp Snap Pro vs. Flashback One35 V2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/gadgets/882641/camp-snap-pro-flashback-one35-v2-digicam-camera-comparison-review" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=882641</id>
			<updated>2026-02-23T16:49:29-05:00</updated>
			<published>2026-02-22T08:00:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Cameras" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Gadgets" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[There's been a surge of interest over the last few years in inexpensive digital cameras. Younger folks are snapping up old point-and-shoots because they view the aesthetic as more authentic and more appealing than smartphone images. Companies are even rereleasing old tech at new prices. And there are cameras like the original Camp Snap: a [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Two cameras (a Camp Snap Pro on the left and a Flashback One35 V2 on the right) balancing on a darkroom clock." data-caption="Fun vibes. Okay-ish photos. | Photo: Antonio G. Di Benedetto / The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Antonio G. Di Benedetto / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/268363_Camp_Snap_Pro_Flashback_One35_V2_camera_review_ADiBenedetto_0001.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Fun vibes. Okay-ish photos. | Photo: Antonio G. Di Benedetto / The Verge	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-drop-cap has-text-align-none">There's been a surge of interest over the last few years in inexpensive digital cameras. Younger folks are snapping up <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/649145/canon-powershot-g7x-iii-tiktok-how-to-buy">old point-and-shoots</a> because they <a href="https://www.theverge.com/c/24208960/digicam-digital-camera-comeback-2004-gen-z-nikon-coolpix">view the aesthetic</a> as more authentic and more appealing than smartphone images. Companies are even <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/774095/canon-powershot-elph-360-hsa-kendall-jenner-reissue-price-specs"><em>rereleasing</em> old tech</a> <a href="https://www.theverge.com/gadgets/873182/canon-limited-edition-powershot-g7-x-mark-iii-graphite-april-available">at new prices</a>. And there are cameras like the original <a href="https://www.campsnapphoto.com/collections/camp-snap-screen-free-digital-cameras/products/screen-free-digital-camera-v103?variant=48757796798768">Camp Snap</a>: a $70 single-button point-and-shoot with no screen, designed as a modern take on a disposable film camera. It's cheap enough to send off with a kid to summer camp and accessible enough for just about anyone to enjoy its lo-fi aesthetic. </p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">I've been testing two charming examples of this formula: the $99 <a href="https://www.campsnapphoto.com/products/cs-pro-camera">Camp S …</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/gadgets/882641/camp-snap-pro-flashback-one35-v2-digicam-camera-comparison-review">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Antonio G. Di Benedetto</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Canon EOS R6 Mark III is great, but this lens is amazing]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/gadgets/850602/canon-eos-r6-mark-iii-rf-45mm-12-camera-lens-impressions-review" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=850602</id>
			<updated>2026-01-04T11:47:42-05:00</updated>
			<published>2025-12-30T09:00:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Cameras" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Gadgets" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Hands-on" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Canon's new EOS R6 Mark III is an excellent camera. It's not a groundbreaking upgrade to the 3-year-old R6 Mark II, but it takes the same body with great ergonomics and adds more resolution, video that now goes up to 7K with open-gate filming, and improved autofocus performance. If you're in need of an impeccably [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="A Canon EOS R6 Mark III camera with RF 45mm f/1.2 STM lens sitting on a wood banister in front of a festive tree and string lights. The background is heavily blurred, with a shallow depth of field." data-caption="An f/1.2 aperture is a beautiful thing." data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/12/258227_Canon_R6_Mark_III_camera_45mm_f1.2_lens_ADiBenedetto_0002.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	An f/1.2 aperture is a beautiful thing.	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-drop-cap has-text-align-none">Canon's new <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/814245/canon-eos-r6-mark-iii-mirrorless-camera-price-specs">EOS R6 Mark III is an excellent camera</a>. It's not a groundbreaking upgrade to the 3-year-old R6 Mark II, but it takes the same body with <a href="https://www.theverge.com/gadgets/837066/sony-mirrorless-camera-ergonomics-a7v-a1-a9iii-canon-nikon">great ergonomics</a> and adds more resolution, video that now goes up to 7K with open-gate filming, and improved autofocus performance. If you're in need of an impeccably good all-around camera for anything from wildlife photography to weddings and videography, you can't go wrong. It's an easy recommendation, especially if you already shoot Canon and are due for an upgrade. (But a <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/used/1733214/canon_eos_r6_mark_ii.html">used R6 Mark II</a> is also very appealing if the higher <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1928858-REG/canon_eos_r6_mark_iii.html">$2,799.99</a> price is too lofty.)</p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">But the lens Canon launched alongsid …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/gadgets/850602/canon-eos-r6-mark-iii-rf-45mm-12-camera-lens-impressions-review">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>David Imel</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Nikon ZR gets surprisingly close to a real RED camera (for a lot less money)]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/gadgets/829930/nikon-zr-review-red-r3d-video-files" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=829930</id>
			<updated>2025-12-01T17:59:57-05:00</updated>
			<published>2025-12-02T08:30:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Cameras" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Gadgets" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[If you shoot video professionally, there's a good chance you've salivated over a RED camera at some point. RED has long been one of the top choices for big-budget productions, offering a combination of image quality and flexibility that's unrivaled by most consumer cameras. They're also wildly expensive, topping out at around $45,000 on the [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="The Nikon ZR with its touchscreen flipped out." data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/11/Nikon-ZR-Review-David-Imel-x-Verge-12.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	The Nikon ZR with its touchscreen flipped out.	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">If you shoot video professionally, there's a good chance you've salivated over a RED camera at some point. RED has long been one of the top choices for big-budget productions, offering a combination of image quality and flexibility that's unrivaled by most consumer cameras. They're also wildly expensive, topping out at around $45,000 on the high-end, putting them far out of reach for most everyday projects. But now, Nikon is promising to take the most unique part of RED - the file format that powers its incredible imagery - and offer it at a fraction of the price.</p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">The $2,200 Nikon ZR is full of features tailored to video shooters. It has a  …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/gadgets/829930/nikon-zr-review-red-r3d-video-files">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Vjeran Pavic</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Hasselblad X2D II: the luxury sports car of medium format cameras]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/camera-review/765305/hasselblad-x2d-ii-the-luxury-sports-car-of-medium-format-cameras" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=765305</id>
			<updated>2025-08-27T07:23:38-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-08-26T08:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Featured Videos" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[We've spent most of the year talking about gadgets getting more expensive. Thanks to US tariffs, prices are rising every few months, and even small upgrades have come with big price hikes. So I was pleasantly surprised to find out that the new Hasselblad X2D 100C II will actually be cheaper than its predecessor, coming [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="A camera sits on smooth surface with small splashes of water surrounding it." data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/DSCF0020.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-drop-cap has-text-align-none">We've spent most of the year talking about gadgets getting <a href="https://www.theverge.com/604742/trump-tariffs-canada-mexico-china-updates#dmcyOnBvc3Q6NjQ3ODEx">more expensive</a>. Thanks to US tariffs, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/739106/sonos-price-hike-tariffs">prices are rising</a> <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/760707/fujifilm-price-increase-cameras-tariffs">every few months</a>, and even small <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/714141/fujifilm-x-e5-camera-review">upgrades</a> have come with big price hikes. So I was pleasantly surprised to find out that the new Hasselblad X2D 100C II will actually be cheaper than its predecessor, coming in at "just" $7,400 for the body. </p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Don't get me wrong. It's far from cheap. But Hasselblad is trying to get this camera in the hands of a wider audience. I've been looking at my account balance ever since I started this review, trying to figure out if I can justify buying one for myself. I probably can't - but not because I d …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/camera-review/765305/hasselblad-x2d-ii-the-luxury-sports-car-of-medium-format-cameras">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Vjeran Pavic</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Fujifilm X-E5 proves familiar isn’t always a bad thing ]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/714141/fujifilm-x-e5-camera-review" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=714141</id>
			<updated>2025-07-27T13:47:02-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-07-27T13:47:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Cameras" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Gadgets" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The X-E5 is Fujifilm's tiny powerhouse. It's part of a line of cameras that has often been described as similar to the X100, except with an interchangeable lens. But the X-E line has evolved this year and is taking on a new shape. It used to be seen as a budget option, but at $1,699, [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Hands holding the Fujifilm X-e5 camera." data-caption="The Fujifilm X-E5 has a familiar but gorgeous new look." data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/07/DSCF6129.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	The Fujifilm X-E5 has a familiar but gorgeous new look.	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">The X-E5 is <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/685782/fujifilm-xe5-mirrorless-camera-x100-price-specs">Fujifilm's tiny powerhouse</a>. It's part of a line of cameras that has often been described as similar to the X100, except with an interchangeable lens. But the X-E line has evolved this year and is taking on a new shape. It used to be seen as a budget option, but at <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1900550-REG/fujifilm_16949844_x_e5_mirrorless_camera_black.html?cnxclid=17534738704901044756815341133008005">$1,699</a>, that can no longer be said.</p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Despite the fact that I've used almost every Fuji out there, this was my first time playing around with any of the X-E line of cameras. The X-E5 is a gorgeous, petite, and classy-looking camera with sharp lines throughout the body, and with buttons and an occasional concave edge for some extra flair and a distinctive look. It is ever …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/714141/fujifilm-x-e5-camera-review">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Vjeran Pavic</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Fujifilm X Half hands-on: whimsical, refreshing, and simply fun]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/673538/fujifilm-x-half-camera-hands-on" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=673538</id>
			<updated>2025-05-23T13:19:45-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-05-23T13:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Featured Videos" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Hands-on" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The first thing I noticed about the Fujifilm X Half is just how small and light it is. The camera is designed to give you no excuses - you should be able to bring it with you everywhere. And after spending a few hours walking around LA with the camera, I'm starting to understand why [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Fujifilm X Half is one of their smallest and lightest cameras to date" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Photo by Vjeran Pavic / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/05/1vpavic_20250522__0019.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">The first thing I noticed about the Fujifilm X Half is just how small and light it is. The camera is designed to give you no excuses - you should be able to bring it with you everywhere. And after spending a few hours walking around LA with the camera, I'm starting to understand why you'd want to.</p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Fujifilm's latest doesn't necessarily impress on paper. The X Half is an $850 camera with a vertically oriented 1-inch sensor capable of taking 18MP photos. There's no electric or hybrid viewfinder, no stabilization, no hot shoe, and it can't even take RAW photos. It's very easy to look at that list of missing features and disregard the camera alt …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/673538/fujifilm-x-half-camera-hands-on">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Vjeran Pavic</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Insta360 X5: the camera I didn’t know I’d like so much]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/video/652887/insta360-x5-camera-review-2025" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=652887</id>
			<updated>2025-04-22T12:31:17-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-04-22T09:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Featured Videos" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Verge Video" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[I never took 360 cameras seriously. That is, until I started spending more of my free time skiing and snowboarding. My social media feeds are inundated with [mostly sponsored] videos of people using these cameras for exactly that purpose - capturing those thrilling moments on the snowy mountains. And the marketing worked. I punched in [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Insta360 X5 within orange backpack" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Vjeran Pavic" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/04/1vpavic_20250420__2755.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">I never took 360 cameras seriously. That is, until I started spending more of my free time skiing and snowboarding. My social media feeds are inundated with [mostly sponsored] videos of people using these cameras for exactly that purpose - capturing those thrilling moments on the snowy mountains. And the marketing worked. I punched in that affiliate link, got myself a new 360 camera last year, and never looked back. I was hooked. </p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">And once Insta360 reached out to tell me about the new X5, I was ready for another adventure. I journeyed back to Tahoe to try the new action camera in my most familiar habitat, test its new larger sensor, more "d …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/video/652887/insta360-x5-camera-review-2025">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>David Imel</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Fujifilm GFX100RF review: one sensor, nine cameras]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/reviews/633769/fuji-gfx-100rf-review-medium-format-compact-camera" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=633769</id>
			<updated>2025-03-24T01:34:48-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-03-22T08:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Camera Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[When Apple introduced the iPhone 15 Pro, Greg Joswiak, the company's senior vice president of worldwide marketing, said the device's three rear cameras would give consumers "the equivalent of seven camera lenses in their pocket." We could spend multiple podcasts debating the technical validity of that statement, but what Joswiak was trying to imply was [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/03/257630_Fuji_GFX_100RF_DImel_0005.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">When Apple introduced the iPhone 15 Pro, Greg Joswiak, the company's senior vice president of worldwide marketing, said the device's three rear cameras would give consumers "the equivalent of seven camera lenses in their pocket."</p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">We could spend multiple podcasts debating the technical validity of that statement, but what Joswiak was trying to imply was that the iPhone now had sensors with a resolution that was big and high enough that it could crop in to emulate various focal lengths.</p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Now, Fujifilm is trying the same thing.</p>
<p class="has-text-align-none">With a 35mm lens stuck to a body shockingly similar to the super-popular X100VI, it would be easy to assume Fuji's n …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/reviews/633769/fuji-gfx-100rf-review-medium-format-compact-camera">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
