<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">The Supreme Court hears arguments for two cases that could reshape the future of the internet &#8211; The Verge</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.</subtitle>

	<updated>2023-05-18T15:08:38+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/23608495/supreme-court-section-230-gonzalez-google-oral-arguments" />
	<id>https://www.theverge.com/rss/stream/23372536</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.theverge.com/rss/stream/23372536" />

	<icon>https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&amp;h=150&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Adi Robertson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Supreme Court rules against reexamining Section 230]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/18/23728423/supreme-court-section-230-gonzalez-google-twitter-taamneh-ruling" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/18/23728423/supreme-court-section-230-gonzalez-google-twitter-taamneh-ruling</id>
			<updated>2023-05-18T11:08:38-04:00</updated>
			<published>2023-05-18T11:08:38-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Creators" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Google" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Law" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="News" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Speech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Twitter - X" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="YouTube" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has declined to consider reinterpreting foundational internet law Section 230, saying it wasn't necessary for deciding the terrorism-related case Gonzalez v. Google. The ruling came alongside a separate but related ruling in Twitter v. Taamneh, where the court concluded that Twitter had not aided and abetted terrorism. In an unsigned opinion issued [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Illustration by Alex Castro / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/11936571/acastro_180806_1777_youtube_cancel_0001.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The Supreme Court has declined to consider reinterpreting foundational internet law Section 230, saying it wasn't necessary for deciding the terrorism-related case <em>Gonzalez v. Google</em>. The ruling came alongside a separate but related ruling in <em>Twitter v. Taamneh, </em>where the court concluded that Twitter had not aided and abetted terrorism.</p>
<p>In an <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1333_6j7a.pdf">unsigned opinion</a> issued today, the court said the underlying complaints in <em>Gonzalez</em> were weak, regardless of Section 230's applicability. The case involved the family of a woman killed in a terrorist attack suing Google, which the family claimed had violated the law by recommending terrorist content on …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/18/23728423/supreme-court-section-230-gonzalez-google-twitter-taamneh-ruling">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Adi Robertson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Supreme Court battle for Section 230 has begun]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/1/23487958/supreme-court-gonzalez-google-twitter-taamneh-section-230" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/1/23487958/supreme-court-gonzalez-google-twitter-taamneh-section-230</id>
			<updated>2023-02-21T09:21:15-05:00</updated>
			<published>2023-02-21T09:21:15-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="News" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Speech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The first shots have been fired in a Supreme Court showdown over web platforms, terrorism, and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzales v. Google - one of two lawsuits that are likely to shape the future of the internet. Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Illustration by Alex Castro / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23986640/acastro_STK092_04.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The first shots have been fired in a Supreme Court showdown over web platforms, terrorism, and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in <em>Gonzales v. Google - </em>one of two lawsuits that are likely to shape the future of the internet.</p>
<p><em>Gonzalez v. Google </em>and <em>Twitter v. Taamneh </em>are a pair of lawsuits blaming platforms for facilitating Islamic State attacks. The court's final ruling on these cases will determine web services' liability for hosting illegal activity, particularly if they promote it with algorithmic recommendations.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/10/3/23385019/supreme-court-grants-petitions-google-twitter-section-230-terrorism">took up both cases</a> in October: one at the  …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/1/23487958/supreme-court-gonzalez-google-twitter-taamneh-section-230">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
