<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Grooveshark in the dock: the music streaming service versus the record labels &#8211; The Verge</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.</subtitle>

	<updated>2014-10-01T16:59:40+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/2/21/2814690/grooveshark-lawsuit-court-case-international" />
	<id>https://www.theverge.com/rss/stream/2578731</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.theverge.com/rss/stream/2578731" />

	<icon>https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&amp;h=150&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Chris Welch</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Music labels get huge victory in quest to sue Grooveshark out of business]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2014/10/1/6880735/labels-get-huge-victory-in-grooveshark-lawsuit" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2014/10/1/6880735/labels-get-huge-victory-in-grooveshark-lawsuit</id>
			<updated>2014-10-01T12:59:40-04:00</updated>
			<published>2014-10-01T12:59:40-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apps" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[It appears Grooveshark's days are just about numbered. The music sharing service has been dealt what could easily amount to a death blow by a US District Court judge, which found that Grooveshark's own employees personally (and willfully) violated and profited from copyright infringement. It's been a long saga; Grooveshark has faced lawsuit after lawsuit [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15006629/grooveshark_googleplay__1020.0.1412191582.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>It appears Grooveshark's days are just about numbered. The music sharing service has been dealt what could easily amount to a death blow by a US District Court judge, which found that Grooveshark's own employees personally (and willfully) violated and profited from copyright infringement. It's been a long saga; Grooveshark has <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/2/21/2814690/grooveshark-lawsuit-court-case-international">faced lawsuit after lawsuit in recent years</a>. It's managed to overcome some by striking deals with publishers, but vengeful music labels haven't given up on sinking the company.</p>
<p>Most recently, Grooveshark had tried to seek protection under the "safe harbor" provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. It took on  …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2014/10/1/6880735/labels-get-huge-victory-in-grooveshark-lawsuit">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Bryan Bishop</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Grooveshark settles with Sony / ATV Music Publishing as it struggles toward legitimacy]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/8/28/4668442/grooveshark-settles-with-sony-atv-music-publishing-as-it-struggles-towards-legitimacy" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2013/8/28/4668442/grooveshark-settles-with-sony-atv-music-publishing-as-it-struggles-towards-legitimacy</id>
			<updated>2013-08-28T14:51:46-04:00</updated>
			<published>2013-08-28T14:51:46-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apps" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The streaming music service Grooveshark has been a legal punching bag for almost the entire music industry, but the company has announced an agreement that will address at least one subset of its legal concerns. Grooveshark has signed a settlement and licensing deal with Sony / ATV Music Publishing that will put the legal battle [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Grooveshark app in Google Play store" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14435766/grooveshark_googleplay__1020.1419979850.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Grooveshark app in Google Play store	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The streaming music service Grooveshark has been a legal punching bag for almost the entire music industry, but the <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/grooveshark-signs-licensing-agreement-with-sonyatv-music-publishing-221376471.html">company has announced an agreement</a> that will address at least one subset of its legal concerns. Grooveshark has signed a settlement and licensing deal with Sony / ATV Music Publishing that will put the legal battle between the two companies to rest, and will also see Sony / ATV's catalog added to Grooveshark's offerings. In a statement, Grooveshark CEO Sam Tarantino said that "We are excited to add Sony / ATV Music's impressive array of songwriters to our catalog further advancing our mission to empower creators with the best a …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/8/28/4668442/grooveshark-settles-with-sony-atv-music-publishing-as-it-struggles-towards-legitimacy">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Greg Sandoval</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Grooveshark settles EMI Publishing lawsuit, still faces uncertain future]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/2013/8/6/4592346/grooveshark-settles-emi-publishing-lawsuit-still-faces-uncertain" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/policy/2013/8/6/4592346/grooveshark-settles-emi-publishing-lawsuit-still-faces-uncertain</id>
			<updated>2013-08-06T08:30:03-04:00</updated>
			<published>2013-08-06T08:30:03-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apps" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Grooveshark, the oft-sued streaming music service, appears to be putting some of its legal troubles behind it. The company is expected to announce, perhaps as early as this week, that it has signed a licensing agreement with EMI Music Publishing after first settling their legal differences. In September, EMI accused Grooveshark of breach of contract [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Grooveshark app in Google Play store" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14412435/grooveshark_googleplay__1020.1419979784.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Grooveshark app in Google Play store	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Grooveshark, <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/2/21/2814690/grooveshark-lawsuit-court-case-international">the oft-sued streaming music service</a>, appears to be putting some of its legal troubles behind it. The company is expected to announce, perhaps as early as this week, that it has signed a licensing agreement with EMI Music Publishing after first settling their legal differences. In September, EMI accused Grooveshark of breach of contract and copyright violations.</p>
<p>This is the latest development in Grooveshark's ongoing legal saga with the top record companies. Seemingly every year, we see Grooveshark license music, then stop paying, and then get sued again. The company enables users to post songs that other listeners can access.  …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/2013/8/6/4592346/grooveshark-settles-emi-publishing-lawsuit-still-faces-uncertain">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Jacob Kastrenakes</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Recording industry threatens YouTube and other music services after copyright law snafu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/4/25/4266184/grooveshark-umg-judge-rules-digital-millenium-copyright-act-1972-audio" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2013/4/25/4266184/grooveshark-umg-judge-rules-digital-millenium-copyright-act-1972-audio</id>
			<updated>2013-04-25T21:57:04-04:00</updated>
			<published>2013-04-25T21:57:04-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[An important legal protection that defends websites like YouTube from being held liable for user-generated copyright infringement has been called into question by a New York state appellate court. Since the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) passed in 1998, companies have been protected under a provision known as "safe harbor" that makes them unaccountable for [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="uscourt3" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14315722/uscourt3.1419979498.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	uscourt3	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>An important legal protection that defends websites like YouTube from being held liable for user-generated copyright infringement <a href="http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&amp;context=historical">has been called into question</a> by a New York state appellate court. Since the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) passed in 1998, companies have been protected under a provision known as "safe harbor" that makes them unaccountable for such content until they becomes aware of it. But now, courts disagree on whether that safe harbor applies to audio recordings created before 1972.</p>
<p><q class="right">Confusion in the courts</q></p>
<p>In a case between <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/11/3151127/grooveshark-dmca-universal-music">Universal Music Group and the music streaming service Grooveshark</a>, the court ruled that the  …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/4/25/4266184/grooveshark-umg-judge-rules-digital-millenium-copyright-act-1972-audio">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Justin Rubio</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[EMI files lawsuit against Grooveshark over unfulfilled payments once again]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/6/3294163/emi-grooveshark-licensing-lawsuit-again" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/6/3294163/emi-grooveshark-licensing-lawsuit-again</id>
			<updated>2012-09-06T05:26:08-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-09-06T05:26:08-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[After finding itself under fire during a licensing suit back in January, Grooveshark is in trouble with EMI yet again. According to CNET, EMI has filed suit against the music streaming service for its failure to provide sales records and make monthly licensing payments, as outlined by a September 2009 agreement. EMI had actually terminated [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Grooveshark on Chrome OS" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14047644/screenshot-20120711-124434.1419973373.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Grooveshark on Chrome OS	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>After finding itself under fire during a <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/1/6/2685974/emi-grooveshark-lawsuit-licensing-dispute">licensing suit back in January</a>, Grooveshark is in trouble with EMI yet again. <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57506524-93/new-lawsuit-adds-to-groovesharks-troubles/?part=rss">According to <em>CNET</em></a>, EMI has filed suit against the music streaming service for its failure to provide sales records and make monthly licensing payments, as outlined by a September 2009 agreement. EMI had actually <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/3/2924021/emi-contract-grooveshark-music-streaming-service/in/2578731">terminated its contract</a> with Grooveshark in March of this year, but the company continued to distribute the label's music through the service.</p>
<p>Grooveshark previously <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/11/3151127/grooveshark-dmca-universal-music">won a dispute against Universal Music</a> using the DMCA's safe harbor provision - which protects hosting sites from liability for user-uploaded content th …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/6/3294163/emi-grooveshark-licensing-lawsuit-again">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Louis Goddard</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Grooveshark wins DMCA argument in dispute with Universal Music]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/11/3151127/grooveshark-dmca-universal-music" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/11/3151127/grooveshark-dmca-universal-music</id>
			<updated>2012-07-11T08:40:33-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-07-11T08:40:33-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[A judge has handed controversial music streaming service Grooveshark a major win in a dispute with record label Universal Music, rejecting an argument which would make Grooveshark responsible for determining the copyright status of all pre-1972 recordings. Arguing in a New York court, Universal had attempted to claim that safe harbor provisions in the Digital [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Grooveshark on Chrome OS" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14005478/screenshot-20120711-124434.1419970868.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Grooveshark on Chrome OS	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>A judge has handed controversial music streaming service Grooveshark a major win in a dispute with record label Universal Music, <a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/124120333/grooveshark-umg">rejecting an argument</a> which would make Grooveshark responsible for determining the copyright status of all pre-1972 recordings. Arguing in a New York court, Universal had attempted to claim that safe harbor provisions in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) do not apply to recordings made before 1972, as the recordings were not covered by federal copyright law at the time of their creation.</p>
<p>It's a flimsy argument - as <em>Techdirt</em> <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120710/14283519650/judge-rejects-key-universal-music-argument-legal-fight-with-grooveshark.shtml">points out</a>, it "failed spectacularly" when EMI attempted to use it against MP3tun …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/11/3151127/grooveshark-dmca-universal-music">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Dieter Bohn</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Grooveshark loses EMI contract, its last major label partner]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/4/3/2924021/emi-contract-grooveshark-music-streaming-service" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/4/3/2924021/emi-contract-grooveshark-music-streaming-service</id>
			<updated>2012-04-03T22:24:04-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-04-03T22:24:04-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[EMI has terminated its contract with Grooveshark, leaving the music streaming service with an uncertain future without support from any major label and pending lawsuits from all four of them, including EMI. The news of the termination comes by way of CNET, and in a statement Grooveshark confirmed the separation: Grooveshark was recently forced to [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="grooveshark" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13939685/IMG_0279.1419966819.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	grooveshark	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>EMI has terminated its contract with Grooveshark, leaving the music streaming service with an uncertain future without support from any major label and <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2011/12/16/2640303/sony-warner-universal-grooveshark-lawsuit">pending lawsuits</a> from all four of them, <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/1/6/2685974/emi-grooveshark-lawsuit-licensing-dispute">including EMI</a>. The news of the termination comes by way of <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-57408868-261/emi-groovesharks-only-major-label-tears-up-contract/"><em>CNET</em></a>, and in a statement Grooveshark confirmed the separation:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Grooveshark was recently forced to make the difficult decision to part ways with EMI due to EMI's currently unsustainable streaming rates and EMI's pending merger with Universal Music Group, which we consider monopolistic and in violation of antitrust laws. To date, Grooveshark has paid over $2.6 million to EMI, but we have yet to f …</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/4/3/2924021/emi-contract-grooveshark-music-streaming-service">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Jamie Keene</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Danish ISP 3 forced to block access to Grooveshark]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/2/21/2814569/denmark-isp-3-grooveshark-injunction-rettighedsalliancen" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/2/21/2814569/denmark-isp-3-grooveshark-injunction-rettighedsalliancen</id>
			<updated>2012-02-21T16:20:05-05:00</updated>
			<published>2012-02-21T16:20:05-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[More bad news for Grooveshark today: a court in Denmark has ruled that both the streaming music service and its users are infringing the copyright of record labels, resulting in an injunction forcing mobile ISP 3 Denmark to block the site. The lawsuit mirrors the allegations of copyright infringement the service is facing in the [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="via dl.dropbox.com" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13916918/danish_flag.1419965329.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	via dl.dropbox.com	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>More bad news for Grooveshark today: a court in Denmark has ruled that both the streaming music service and its users are infringing the copyright of record labels, resulting in an injunction forcing mobile ISP 3 Denmark to block the site. The lawsuit mirrors the allegations of copyright infringement the service is facing in the US, with Universal, <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/1/6/2685974/emi-grooveshark-lawsuit-licensing-dispute">EMI</a>, <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2011/12/16/2640303/sony-warner-universal-grooveshark-lawsuit">Sony, and Warner</a> alleging that Grooveshark hosts illegal copies of music and is unresponsive to takedown notices. The scale of the Danish case is broader: the RettighedsAlliancen group which won the injunction represents 30 rights holders in all.</p>
<p>RettighedsAlliancen hopes that the injunction …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/2/21/2814569/denmark-isp-3-grooveshark-injunction-rettighedsalliancen">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Adi Robertson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[EMI sues Grooveshark over licensing dispute]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/1/6/2685974/emi-grooveshark-lawsuit-licensing-dispute" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/1/6/2685974/emi-grooveshark-lawsuit-licensing-dispute</id>
			<updated>2012-01-06T04:59:03-05:00</updated>
			<published>2012-01-06T04:59:03-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[EMI has just become the latest of four major labels to sue streaming music service Grooveshark. The label had previously sued for copyright infringement, but ended up settling with Grooveshark in 2009 and licensing its music to the service. Now, however, it's saying that Grooveshark has "made not a single royalty payment to EMI, nor [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Grooveshark" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13900311/groove4.1419964223.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Grooveshark	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>EMI has just become the latest of four major labels to sue streaming music service Grooveshark. The label had previously sued for copyright infringement, but ended up settling with Grooveshark in 2009 and licensing its music to the service. Now, however, it's saying that Grooveshark has "made not a single royalty payment to EMI, nor provided a single accounting statement." Grooveshark has allegedly estimated its debts at $150,000, but EMI says the actual amount is much higher.</p>
<p>In the last few months, Sony, Warner, and Universal Music <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2011/12/16/2640303/sony-warner-universal-grooveshark-lawsuit">have all filed suit</a> against Grooveshark for copyright infringement, and the addition of EMI's suit means Gro …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/1/6/2685974/emi-grooveshark-lawsuit-licensing-dispute">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>David Pierce</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Sony, Warner join Universal&#8217;s lawsuit against Grooveshark]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2011/12/16/2640303/sony-warner-universal-grooveshark-lawsuit" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2011/12/16/2640303/sony-warner-universal-grooveshark-lawsuit</id>
			<updated>2011-12-16T09:39:27-05:00</updated>
			<published>2011-12-16T09:39:27-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Grooveshark is no stranger to lawsuits, but the company may be facing its biggest battle yet - Sony and Warner this week joined in a lawsuit with Universal Music that seems clearly aimed at wiping the music service off the map. Universal filed the original copyright infringement lawsuit in November, alleging that Grooveshark executives personally [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Grooveshark" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13893571/groove4.1419963782.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Grooveshark	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Grooveshark is <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/10/emi-drops-suit-against-grooveshark-music-service-licenses-it-instead/">no stranger to lawsuits</a>, but the company may be facing its biggest battle yet - Sony and Warner this week joined in a lawsuit with Universal Music that seems clearly aimed at wiping the music service off the map. Universal filed the original copyright infringement lawsuit in November, alleging that Grooveshark executives personally uploaded illegal songs to the site. With Sony and Warner backing the suit, it effectively pits the entire inudstry against Grooveshark.</p>
<p>Grooveshark's long-standing defense has been the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act">DMCA</a>, which puts the responsibility on copyright owners to ask for infringing content to be taken down - it's the  …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2011/12/16/2640303/sony-warner-universal-grooveshark-lawsuit">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
