<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">AT&#038;T&#8217;s FaceTime fiasco: net neutrality concerns spark a backlash &#8211; The Verge</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.</subtitle>

	<updated>2013-05-20T18:12:46+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/8/22/3260771/ATT-facetime-3g-charges" />
	<id>https://www.theverge.com/rss/stream/3024812</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.theverge.com/rss/stream/3024812" />

	<icon>https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&amp;h=150&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Adi Robertson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#038;T says &#8216;any&#8217; mobile video chat app will work on its network by the end of 2013]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/5/20/4348672/att-will-allow-all-video-chat-apps-on-its-network-by-end-of-2013" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2013/5/20/4348672/att-will-allow-all-video-chat-apps-on-its-network-by-end-of-2013</id>
			<updated>2013-05-20T14:12:46-04:00</updated>
			<published>2013-05-20T14:12:46-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apps" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="AT&amp;T" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Google" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Mobile" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[When Google Hangouts first launched, we noted that AT&#38;T Android customers couldn't use its video chat capabilities on a cellular network. A statement from AT&#38;T implied that video chat could be used on downloaded apps (like the iOS Hangouts app), but that Google would need to work with AT&#38;T to enable it for pre-loaded apps, [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Google Hangouts AT&amp;T Blocked (STOCK)" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14339987/google-hangouts-att-blocked1_2040.1419979568.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Google Hangouts AT&amp;T Blocked (STOCK)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>When Google Hangouts first launched, we noted that <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/15/4335262/google-hangout-video-chats-dont-work-on-att-cellular-connections-but-why">AT&amp;T Android customers couldn't use its video chat capabilities</a> on a cellular network. A statement from AT&amp;T implied that video chat could be used on downloaded apps (like the iOS Hangouts app), but that Google would need to work with AT&amp;T to enable it for pre-loaded apps, which Hangouts for Android technically is. Now, AT&amp;T has given another statement, suggesting that we could see an across-the-board approval of video chat apps by the end of the year.</p>
<!-- extended entry --><hr class="widget_boundry_marker hidden page_break"><blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>For video chat apps that come pre-loaded on devices, we currently give all OS and device makers the ability for those apps to work over cell …</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/5/20/4348672/att-will-allow-all-video-chat-apps-on-its-network-by-end-of-2013">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Chris Welch</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Thousands of angry AT&#038;T customers speak out as Free Press pushes for net neutrality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/21/3899698/free-press-invites-att-customers-to-air-grievances-publicly" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/21/3899698/free-press-invites-att-customers-to-air-grievances-publicly</id>
			<updated>2013-01-21T11:15:06-05:00</updated>
			<published>2013-01-21T11:15:06-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Mobile" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#38;T recently made FaceTime calling available to all eligible customers on tiered data plans, but advocacy group Free Press remains unimpressed with the move. Immediately after AT&#38;T announced it would expand support for Apple's video calling protocol, Free Press lambasted the carrier for not opening access to its entire customer base - including unlimited data [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="AT&amp;T logo (STOCK)" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14211557/att-logo-hq-stock_1020.1419979210.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	AT&amp;T logo (STOCK)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>AT&amp;T recently made FaceTime calling available to all eligible customers on tiered data plans, but <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/21/3258421/free-press-att-facetime-petition-fcc">advocacy group Free Press remains unimpressed</a> with the move. Immediately after AT&amp;T announced it would expand support for Apple's video calling protocol, Free Press lambasted the carrier for not opening access to its entire customer base - including unlimited data subscribers. Now the organization is urging AT&amp;T's customers to tell the company how they <em>really</em> feel, and Free Press is even giving them a public platform for the cause. Entering your name, email address, zip code, and ticking a box confirming you're an AT&amp;T user is all it takes to ha …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/21/3899698/free-press-invites-att-customers-to-air-grievances-publicly">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>TC. Sottek</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#038;T staves off net neutrality complaint by giving another inch, but it&#8217;s not fooling anyone]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/16/3884200/att-gives-net-neutrality-another-inch" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/16/3884200/att-gives-net-neutrality-another-inch</id>
			<updated>2013-01-16T18:25:20-05:00</updated>
			<published>2013-01-16T18:25:20-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Mobile" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Report" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#38;T announced today that it would be gracious enough to let some more of its users - including those without LTE - to enjoy FaceTime over cellular, as the spirit of net neutrality rules require. But it's just the latest half-measure the company has taken to rectify an issue that groups like Public Knowledge and [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Gallery Photo: Samsung Galaxy Note for AT&amp;T hands-on photos" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14207123/AT_T-Galaxy-Note-DSC_1443-verge-1020.1419979199.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Gallery Photo: Samsung Galaxy Note for AT&amp;T hands-on photos	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>AT&amp;T announced today that it would be gracious enough to let some more of its users - including those without LTE - to enjoy FaceTime over cellular, as the spirit of net neutrality rules require. But it's just the latest half-measure the company has taken to rectify an issue that groups like Public Knowledge and Free Press have argued all along: that AT&amp;T simply has no right to arbitrarily decide how its customers may use the data they pay for from an ISP. So far<a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/25/3404938/fcc-julius-genachowski-att-facetime/in/3024812"> the FCC has been reluctant</a> to publicly denounce AT&amp;T for the practice, and it seems intent on keeping any reconciliation between AT&amp;T and interest groups behind the scenes. Sources  …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/16/3884200/att-gives-net-neutrality-another-inch">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Adi Robertson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#038;T adds support for FaceTime on iPhone 4S and other non-LTE devices]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/16/3883562/att-adds-support-for-facetime-on-iphone-4s-non-lte-devices" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/16/3883562/att-adds-support-for-facetime-on-iphone-4s-non-lte-devices</id>
			<updated>2013-01-16T14:36:07-05:00</updated>
			<published>2013-01-16T14:36:07-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Mobile" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#38;T has once again loosened the reins on using Apple's FaceTime service: it's now allowing customers on any compatible device - not just LTE-capable ones - to video chat while on a mobile network. Over the next couple of weeks, the company will start rolling out the option to people with compatible iOS devices like [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Facetime over LTE" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14206959/nathan_sam_facetime.1419979199.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Facetime over LTE	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>AT&amp;T has once again loosened the reins on using Apple's FaceTime service: it's now allowing customers on any compatible device - not just LTE-capable ones - to video chat while on a mobile network. Over the next couple of weeks, the company will start rolling out the option to people with compatible iOS devices like the 4S, so long as they're on tiered plans rather than grandfathered unlimited ones; the entire expansion is supposed to take a few months, however.</p>
<p>FaceTime has been a <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/18/3351626/att-facetime-block-fcc-complaint-net-neutrality/in/3024812">point of contention</a> for net neutrality advocates, as it's an example of AT&amp;T cutting off access to an arguably competing service that runs through its network, a …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/16/3883562/att-adds-support-for-facetime-on-iphone-4s-non-lte-devices">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Nathan Ingraham</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#038;T briefly extends FaceTime over cellular to unlimited data users before disabling it again (update)]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/21/3675242/att-facetime-cellular-unlimited-data" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/21/3675242/att-facetime-cellular-unlimited-data</id>
			<updated>2012-11-21T09:53:23-05:00</updated>
			<published>2012-11-21T09:53:23-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Mobile" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Last week, AT&#38;T slightly loosened its restrictions that previously required iPhone users to who wanted to use FaceTime over cellular networks to be on a Mobile Share data plan - the carrier said that iOS users with an LTE device and a tiered data plan would be able to use the feature. However, we have [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Facetime over LTE" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14142725/nathan_sam_facetime.1419979023.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Facetime over LTE	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Last week, AT&amp;T slightly <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/8/3619034/at-t-loosens-facetime-restrictions-allows-iphone-5-users-to-video">loosened its restrictions</a> that previously required iPhone users to who wanted to use FaceTime over cellular networks to <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/17/3250228/att-facetime-over-cellular-ios-6-mobile-share/in/3024812">be on a Mobile Share data plan</a> - the carrier said that iOS users with an LTE device and a tiered data plan would be able to use the feature. However, we have confirmed that some iPhone users with grandfathered unlimited data plans are also able to make FaceTime calls over cellular networks, corroborating <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2012/11/21/att-seems-to-be-extending-facetime-over-cellular-to-all-customers/">earlier reports</a>. Strangely enough, AT&amp;T said earlier that FaceTime over cellular for users not on Mobile Share plans wouldn't be available for a few months, so it appears that the switch has been fl …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/21/3675242/att-facetime-cellular-unlimited-data">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Chris Ziegler</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#038;T&#8217;s flip-flop on FaceTime over cellular should scare you]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/8/3619058/att-facetime-flip-flop-fcc" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/8/3619058/att-facetime-flip-flop-fcc</id>
			<updated>2012-11-08T15:38:34-05:00</updated>
			<published>2012-11-08T15:38:34-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Features" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Mobile" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Report" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Weeks after taking enormous heat from consumers, public interest groups, and the media (like us), AT&#38;T is doing an about-face on its controversial decision to limit iOS 6's support for FaceTime over cellular to its new, pricier Mobile Share plans. That's great, but don't give AT&#38;T an ounce of credit - the move is mysteriously [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="iPad FaceTime LTE 1024 Angry Josh" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14125055/ipad-factetime-lte.1419978992.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	iPad FaceTime LTE 1024 Angry Josh	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Weeks after taking enormous heat from consumers, public interest groups, and the media (<a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/17/3250565/att-hostile-facetime-restrictions-likely-dont-violate-fcc-rules/in/3024812">like us</a>), AT&amp;T is doing an about-face on its controversial decision to limit iOS 6's support for FaceTime over cellular to its new, pricier Mobile Share plans. That's great, but don't give AT&amp;T an ounce of credit - the move is mysteriously taking eight to ten weeks to implement, and it's merely restoring functionality that should've been present from day one. It also would've never happened had organizations like <a href="http://publicknowledge.org/att-reverses-course-facetime-blocking">Public Knowledge</a> and <a href="http://www.freepress.net/press-release/100810/att-reverses-course-facetime-blocking">Free Press</a> not made it clear to AT&amp;T that they'd pursue all legal avenues to get the block removed. "We got to a place that …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/8/3619058/att-facetime-flip-flop-fcc">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Nathan Ingraham</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#038;T loosens FaceTime restrictions, allows some iPhone 5 and iPad users to video chat over LTE]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/8/3619034/at-t-loosens-facetime-restrictions-allows-iphone-5-users-to-video" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/8/3619034/at-t-loosens-facetime-restrictions-allows-iphone-5-users-to-video</id>
			<updated>2012-11-08T14:48:30-05:00</updated>
			<published>2012-11-08T14:48:30-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apps" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#38;T just announced that it is easing some of the restrictions it placed on the iPhone's FaceTime feature - now, iOS 6 users with an LTE-capable device will be able to use FaceTime over cellular, as long as they're using a tiered data plan. Specifically, compatible devices include the iPhone 5 as well as the [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Apple AT&amp;T Facetime cellular error (STOCK)" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14125045/att-facetime-cellular-error-stock_1020.1419978992.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Apple AT&amp;T Facetime cellular error (STOCK)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>AT&amp;T just announced that it is easing some of the restrictions it placed on the iPhone's FaceTime feature - now, iOS 6 users with an LTE-capable device will be able to use FaceTime over cellular, as long as they're using a tiered data plan. Specifically, compatible devices include the iPhone 5 as well as the third- and fourth-generation iPad and the iPad mini. Unfortunately, it seems that those with grandfathered data plans are out of luck.</p>
<p>Things haven't changed for all of the other iPhone users on AT&amp;T's network - they'll still have to be on a mobile share plan to use FaceTime on a cellular network. Strangely enough, AT&amp;T is saying that c …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/8/3619034/at-t-loosens-facetime-restrictions-allows-iphone-5-users-to-video">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>TC. Sottek</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[FCC will review objections to AT&#038;T&#8217;s FaceTime blocking, &#8216;exercise our responsibilities&#8217; if necessary]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/25/3404938/fcc-julius-genachowski-att-facetime" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/25/3404938/fcc-julius-genachowski-att-facetime</id>
			<updated>2012-09-25T12:15:06-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-09-25T12:15:06-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Mobile" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The FCC has yet to comment on AT&#38;T's decision to limit FaceTime over cellular connections, but in remarks made today at Vox Media's offices in Washington, DC, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski suggested that the agency would review complaints about the service. Genachowski said that he couldn't comment specifically on AT&#38;T at this time, but that [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="FCC Julius Genachowski Vox Media" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14066576/Julius-Genachowski-fcc-vox-media_1020.1419974361.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	FCC Julius Genachowski Vox Media	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The FCC has yet to comment on AT&amp;T's decision to limit FaceTime over cellular connections, but in <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/25/3404236/fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski-live-vox-media#">remarks made today</a> at Vox Media's offices in Washington, DC, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski suggested that the agency would review complaints about the service. Genachowski said that he couldn't comment specifically on AT&amp;T at this time, but that if a good-faith effort to resolve the issue "doesn't lead to a resolution and a complaint is filed, we will exercise our responsibilities and we will act." But the FCC shouldn't be waiting long to receive a formal complaint: internet and net neutrality advocates<a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/22/3260302/att-facetime-locking-response"> responded swiftly</a> to AT&amp;T's actions, cla …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/25/3404938/fcc-julius-genachowski-att-facetime">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>TC. Sottek</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[AT&#038;T&#8217;s FaceTime blocking draws formal complaint to FCC from interest groups]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/18/3351626/att-facetime-block-fcc-complaint-net-neutrality" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/18/3351626/att-facetime-block-fcc-complaint-net-neutrality</id>
			<updated>2012-09-18T09:47:55-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-09-18T09:47:55-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Mobile" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Free Press, Public Knowledge, and the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute have announced plans to file a formal complaint with the FCC over AT&#38;T's decision to block FaceTime for some customers. It's not a surprising move - Free Press, Public Knowledge, and other groups blasted AT&#38;T over its new FaceTime policy last month, with [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Apple AT&amp;T Facetime cellular error (STOCK)" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14059680/att-facetime-cellular-error-stock_1020.1419974052.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Apple AT&amp;T Facetime cellular error (STOCK)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Free Press, Public Knowledge, and the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute have announced plans to file a formal complaint with the FCC over <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/17/3250228/att-facetime-over-cellular-ios-6-mobile-share">AT&amp;T's decision to block FaceTime</a> for some customers. It's not a surprising move - Free Press, Public Knowledge, and other groups <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/22/3260302/att-facetime-locking-response">blasted AT&amp;T over its new FaceTime policy </a>last month, with Free Press claiming that the carrier's "decision to block FaceTime unless a customer pays for voice and text minutes she doesn't need is a clear violation of the FCC's Open Internet rules." The group filing the complaint argues that AT&amp;T's actions harm all its customers, particularly for "the deaf" and " …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/18/3351626/att-facetime-block-fcc-complaint-net-neutrality">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Ben Kersey</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Vodafone UK mimics AT&#038;T by requiring custom plans for FaceTime over 3G]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/13/3325876/vodafone-facetime-3g-data" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/13/3325876/vodafone-facetime-3g-data</id>
			<updated>2012-09-13T10:02:21-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-09-13T10:02:21-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Mobile" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[iPhone 5 users on Vodafone's network in the UK may have to upgrade their service plan in order to use FaceTime over 3G, echoing a similar move by AT&#38;T. According to Wired UK, Vodafone will require customers to have a VoIP add-on for their plan in order to use Apple's video calling service over a [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="iPhone 5 display" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14055054/oi-5.1419973804.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	iPhone 5 display	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>iPhone 5 users on Vodafone's network in the UK may have to upgrade their service plan in order to use FaceTime over 3G, echoing a <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/17/3250228/att-facetime-over-cellular-ios-6-mobile-share">similar move</a> by AT&amp;T. <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/13/facetime-3g-ios6">According to <em>Wired UK</em></a>, Vodafone will require customers to have a VoIP add-on for their plan in order to use Apple's video calling service over a cellular network, a new feature in iOS 6. If customers don't already have VoIP support, they'll have to adopt a newer service plan or pay an additional fee to add VoIP to their existing plan. Any new customers to the carrier seeking the iPhone 5 won't be affected, however, as the recently added Red data plans include VoIP and tethering by default. As …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/9/13/3325876/vodafone-facetime-3g-data">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
