<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Reddit&#8217;s balance of power: community values are tested as a troll is unmasked &#8211; The Verge</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.</subtitle>

	<updated>2012-10-18T23:24:30+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/17/3516376/reddit-balance-of-power-stream" />
	<id>https://www.theverge.com/rss/stream/3280417</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.theverge.com/rss/stream/3280417" />

	<icon>https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&amp;h=150&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Bryan Bishop</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Violentacrez apologizes: &#8216;I was playing to an audience of college kids&#8217;]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/18/3523434/violentacrez-michael-brutsch-apologizes-cnn" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/18/3523434/violentacrez-michael-brutsch-apologizes-cnn</id>
			<updated>2012-10-18T19:24:30-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-10-18T19:24:30-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Entertainment" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Michael Brutsch - the man behind the controversial Reddit handle Violentacrez - has spoken to CNN, offering up an apology and an explanation for his actions on the site. Brutsch, whose public identity was outed by Gawker last week, said in an interview that he made a "huge mistake" in creating subreddits that served as [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Violentavrez CNN interview" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14097785/violentacrez_cnn_640.1419978940.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Violentavrez CNN interview	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Michael Brutsch - the man behind the controversial Reddit handle Violentacrez - has spoken to CNN, offering up an apology and an explanation for his actions on the site. Brutsch, whose public identity was <a href="http://gawker.com/5950981/unmasking-reddits-violentacrez-the-biggest-troll-on-the-web">outed by <em>Gawker</em> last week</a>, said in an interview that he made a "huge mistake" in creating subreddits that served as places to share everything from rape jokes to pictures of pregnant women. "Well, I am to some degree apologizing for what I did. Again, I was playing to an audience of college kids," he said. "The audience was appreciative and supportive of the kind of gallows humor that I put out there."</p>
<p>The disclosure of Violentacrez's true …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/18/3523434/violentacrez-michael-brutsch-apologizes-cnn">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Sean Hollister</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Reddit CEO addresses Violentacrez controversy: &#8216;we will not ban legitimate investigative journalism&#8217;]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/16/3514232/reddit-ceo-yishan-wong-leak-memo-violentacrez-doxxing-ban" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/16/3514232/reddit-ceo-yishan-wong-leak-memo-violentacrez-doxxing-ban</id>
			<updated>2012-10-16T20:49:53-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-10-16T20:49:53-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Reddit doesn't really dictate how its corner of the internet is run, but CEO Yishan Wong has some strong suggestions for dealing with recent events: "We will not ban legal content even if we find it odious or if we personally condemn it," he writes, in a leaked memo posted today and obtained by Gawker. [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Reddit logo stock press 1024+" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14095147/reddit_logo2.1419978933.jpeg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Reddit logo stock press 1024+	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Reddit doesn't really dictate how its corner of the internet is run, but CEO Yishan Wong has some strong suggestions for dealing with recent events: "We will not ban legal content even if we find it odious or if we personally condemn it," he writes, in a leaked memo posted today and <a href="http://gawker.com/5952349/">obtained by <em>Gawker</em></a>. He's referring to the <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/16/3512336/reddit-user-transparency-criticism">ongoing Violentacrez controversy</a>, of course. Last week, that very same <em>Gawker</em> unmasked one of Reddit's most unsavory trolls, posting his real identity for all to see. Allegedly, <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/pointandclick/comments/11dkn9/tea_break_escape/c6mlq3u">it cost Violentacrez his job</a>. At the same time, <em>Gawker</em> sister site <em>Jezbel</em> <a href="http://jezebel.com/5949379/naming-names-is-this-the-solution-to-combat-reddits-creepshots?popular=true">ran a story</a> which suggested that naming names was the only way to comba …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/16/3514232/reddit-ceo-yishan-wong-leak-memo-violentacrez-doxxing-ban">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Adi Robertson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Banned Reddit moderator fears &#8216;cloak and dagger&#8217; handling of criticism]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/16/3512336/reddit-user-transparency-criticism" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/16/3512336/reddit-user-transparency-criticism</id>
			<updated>2012-10-16T15:01:07-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-10-16T15:01:07-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Report" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Thanks to its 40 million loosely moderated users, Reddit has achieved massive growth with a minimum of regulation. Its hands-off approach is strongly libertarian, giving users a platform to say almost anything while treating anonymity as sacrosanct. But after the publication of a Gawker article outing Violentacrez, one of Reddit's most controversial users, moderators and [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Reddit Ban Icon" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14094674/redditban.1419978932.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Reddit Ban Icon	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Thanks to its 40 million loosely moderated users, Reddit has achieved massive growth with a minimum of regulation. Its hands-off approach is strongly libertarian, giving users a platform to say almost anything while treating anonymity as sacrosanct. But after the publication of a <a href="http://gawker.com/5950981/unmasking-reddits-violentacrez-the-biggest-troll-on-the-web"><em>Gawker</em> article outing Violentacrez</a>, one of Reddit's most controversial users, moderators and admins are increasingly having to decide where to draw the line when the two conflict - and how to deal with criticism of their policies.</p>
<p>At its most concrete, this conflict manifests in discussions about whether (and how) to ban either links to recent pieces on <em>Gawker </em>and <em> …</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/16/3512336/reddit-user-transparency-criticism">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>TC. Sottek</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Reddit user banned, then restored, as mods struggle with stories critical of the site]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/15/3507118/reddit-moderator-subreddit-control" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/15/3507118/reddit-moderator-subreddit-control</id>
			<updated>2012-10-15T16:30:02-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-10-15T16:30:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Report" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Without a hint of irony, one or more of the moderators for r/technology, one of Reddit's largest communities, banned a user for submitting a report on the site's moderation problems last night. The submitter of the article, user CivAndTrees, told us they were banned from r/technology without warning or explanation. The action follows several efforts [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="youve been banned" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14093207/bannedhed.1419978929.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	youve been banned	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/14/3499796/reddit-moderator-secrecy-subreddit-control">Without a hint of irony</a>, one or more of the moderators for r/technology, one of Reddit's largest communities,<a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/11h6xg/reddit_leaders_deflect_censorship_criticism_and/"> banned a user for submitting a report on the site's moderation problems </a>last night. The submitter of the article, user CivAndTrees, told us they were banned from r/technology without warning or explanation. The action follows several efforts by Reddit's most prominent and secretive moderators to control the spread of information about leaked user Violentacrez, who was responsible for the creation of controversial subreddits containing hateful speech and sexual content involving minors.</p>
<p><img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/assets/1561633/banned.JPG" class="photo" alt="Banned"><br id="1350322394395"></p><p><q class="center">"Reddit is getting bigger and bigger, and it see …</q></p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/15/3507118/reddit-moderator-subreddit-control">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>TC. Sottek</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Reddit leaders deflect censorship criticism and defend hands-off policies]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/14/3499796/reddit-moderator-secrecy-subreddit-control" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/14/3499796/reddit-moderator-secrecy-subreddit-control</id>
			<updated>2012-10-14T12:54:20-04:00</updated>
			<published>2012-10-14T12:54:20-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Entertainment" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Report" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Web" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Reddit prides itself on its decentralized meritocracy -"subreddits are a free market. Anyone can create a subreddit and decide how it's run," it says. So far this model has been very successful in launching sites: there are tens of thousands of subreddits on any imaginable topic, with an endless supply of new forums open for [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Reddit GM Erik Martin" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14091181/redditadmin.1419978926.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Reddit GM Erik Martin	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Reddit prides itself on its decentralized meritocracy -"subreddits are a free market. Anyone can create a subreddit and decide how it's run," it says. So far this model has been very successful in launching sites: there are tens of thousands of subreddits on any imaginable topic, with an endless supply of new forums open for the taking, all which rise and fall based on the desires of the community. Reddit generally polices just five basic rules, one of which is "don't post personal information." Other rules include no spam, no cheating the system, and no child pornography - <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/blog/comments/pmj7f/a_necessary_change_in_policy/">a rule that expanded</a> just seven months ago to include "no suggestive …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/14/3499796/reddit-moderator-secrecy-subreddit-control">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
