There are plenty of cord-cutters who would love to access HBO content without a cable subscription, but is a standalone version of the network actually viable? Not according to HBO. Recently Jake Caputo launched a site to grab the network’s attention called Take My Money, HBO!. It lets users type in how much they would pay for a version of HBO Go that didn’t require a cable subscription, with the results then posted on Twitter along with the hashtag #takemymoneyhbo. HBO took notice and issued the following response:
HBO won’t be offering a cable-free HBO Go option ‘for now’
HBO has responded to a campaign urging the network to offer HBO Go without a cable subscription, and it looks like we won’t be seeing such a service anytime soon.
HBO has responded to a campaign urging the network to offer HBO Go without a cable subscription, and it looks like we won’t be seeing such a service anytime soon.


Love the love for HBO. Keep it up. For now, @RyanLawler @TechCrunch has it right: itsh.bo/JLtSFE #takemymoneyHBO
— HBO (@HBO) June 6, 2012
The TechCrunch article in question looks at some of the drawbacks to offering HBO Go as a separate product, and determines that what the network would lose — including the loss of sales and marketing support provided by its distributors — would ultimately outweigh the benefits of garnering new, cable-free customers. HBO apparently agrees. So, for now at least, if you want to watch Game of Thrones on your Kindle Fire, you’ll still need a cable subscription to do so.
Most Popular
- The iPhone Duo is a messy, expensive, good time
- Trump says Sundar Pichai talked him out of renaming the Atlantic Ocean
- Bill Gates says to prepare for 20 years of ‘tumultuous’ AI disruption
- Tesla driver using Full Self-Driving struck and killed a man crossing I-80
- PHP: The three letters that shut down sites all over the internet today











