Oz the Great and Powerful may not have received the glowing reviews director Sam Raimi was hoping for, but the remake has at least succeeded in sparking a copyright dispute between Disney and Warner Bros. As Luke Buckmaster explains in a piece for Crikey, the issue stems from the fact that Frank Baum’s original book, written in 1900, is under public domain, while Warner Bros’ 1939 film adaptation is not. This means that the book’s central characters are free of copyright, but qualities unique to the film itself — red shoes, hairstyles, or even specific shades of green — are under Warner Bros’ control.
Behind the curtain of ‘Oz’ looms a complex copyright battle


“In the context of an escapist fantasy intended to transport viewers to a rainbow coloured parallel dream world, this is the ultimate reality check,” Buckmaster writes. “No matter how many times Dorothy clicks her heels, she’d better be certain that ‘there’s no place like home’ doesn’t have a TM looming after it.”
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Most Popular
Most Popular
- Samsung’s wider Z Fold 8 feels just right
- The new Halo remake is a reminder of what Xbox used to be
- Google hit with $1 billion fine for breaking EU antitrust rules
- The right-wing boomers protesting data centers have a lot in common with the left
- The sci-fi movie that imagines AI isn’t so dystopian after all











