One of the most memorable bits of Google lore is the company’s penchant for grilling interviewees with mind-bending or seemingly impossible questions — but as it turns out, those questions aren’t at all helpful. “How many golf balls can you fit into an airplane? How many gas stations in Manhattan? A complete waste of time,” Laszlo Bock, a senior vice president at Google, told The New York Times. “They don’t predict anything.” Bock notes that the company has since found that using a consistent rubric is a more effective way of judging applicants.
Google’s infamous mind-bending interview questions are ‘a complete waste of time’


Google’s notoriously difficult interview questions have been widely reported for years. But Google is apparently now more interested in the behavior of interviewees than their on-the-spot displays of intellect. Bock says that by asking a simple question like, “Give me an example of a time when you solved an analytically difficult problem,” that the interviewer can get a sense of both how the respondent acts and what the respondent thinks is difficult — two important qualities to know.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Most Popular
Most Popular
- GitHub faces a fight for its survival at Microsoft
- If I could only have one laptop for work and gaming, I’d get this one
- Anker’s new earbuds have the best call quality I’ve ever heard
- ‘Fuck you, Bambu’: How one private message could change the face of 3D printing
- In desperate times, graduates find hope in humiliating tech CEOs









