A federal judge has ruled that the current process for managing the federal no-fly list is unconstitutional. In her ruling, Judge Anna Brown called the DHS TRIP system “wholly ineffective,” making it nearly impossible for the plaintiffs in the case to challenge the evidence that had placed them on the no-fly list and effectively barred them from air travel in the US. As a result, Brown concluded that the process did not meet the standard for due process, and was unconstitutional in its current form.
US no-fly list process is ruled unconstitutional


The lawsuit comes after four years of legal wrangling by thirteen Portland-based plaintiffs, the first of whom was refused boarding in 2010. With legal help from the American Civil Liberties Union, the group pressed their case through two earlier trials, only to arrive at their first definitive ruling today. The Department of Justice is expected to appeal the ruling, with the next stage of the trial taking shape in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Most Popular
Most Popular
- Apple agrees to pay iPhone owners $250 million for not delivering AI Siri
- Here’s what Microsoft is offering long-serving employees to voluntarily retire
- Nintendo announces a new Star Fox for the Switch 2
- The Remarkable Paper Pure is the best digital notepad I’ve ever used
- Valve just imported 50 tons of game consoles in two days











