A new piece in The New York Times Magazine looks at the growing controversy surrounding three-parent fertilization. The procedure introduces a donor’s cytoplasm into the mother’s egg, potentially adding a third parent’s genetic data to the child, but effectively treating mitochondrial disorders and a range of infertility issues. As the science develops, it’s also become the center of a heated battle around genetic ethics. Three-parent IVF is the first technique to alters the germ line, disrupting the natural flow of genetic information from parent to child. As a result, many are already casting it as the first step towards genetic engineering. Three-parent fertilization already works as medicine, and could make a huge difference for the millions of women struggling to conceive, but ethical questions are still holding it back. Now that we have the power, should we use it?
Is this procedure the first step toward genetic engineering?


Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Most Popular
Most Popular
- Apple agrees to pay iPhone owners $250 million for not delivering AI Siri
- Here’s what Microsoft is offering long-serving employees to voluntarily retire
- Valve just imported 50 tons of game consoles in two days
- The Remarkable Paper Pure is the best digital notepad I’ve ever used
- Nintendo announces a new Star Fox for the Switch 2











