There’s no end to headlines about the dangers of head injuries in football. But a new study suggests that high school football, at least, was not associated with cognitive problems — like having trouble remembering words or letters — later in life. The new study isn’t the last word on the dangers of football, especially for kids, but it shows that more research needs to be done.
High school football isn’t linked to brain problems later on — if you played in the 1950s
This counters some of the narrative around traumatic brain injury
This counters some of the narrative around traumatic brain injury


Researchers looked at long-term survey data from men who graduated high school in Wisconsin in 1957; some had played high school football, some hadn’t. Playing the sport didn’t lead to cognitive impairment at age 65, according to a study published today in JAMA Neurology. In fact, the football players were even slightly less likely to have depression.
Football is known to cause a head injury called chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE. Research has shown that CTE is linked to — among other things — memory loss, depression, and dementia. But most of these studies have been done using donated brains, which means scientists were studying the brains of people whose relatives probably already suspected that something was wrong. “There was very limited studies on the long-term effects for more limited exposure like high-school exposure,” says study co-author Dylan Small, a statistician at the University of Pennsylvania.
Small’s team analyzed data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, who tracked people who graduated in 1957 and followed up later in life. The study said whether the participant had played football, and follow-ups recorded mental health and cognitive abilities. The researchers looked at the cognition and depression scores of 3,904 people, and compared the football players to the non-football players. There was no real difference.
There are limitations, of course, and Small cautions against “over-interpreting the results.” First, anyone who “played high-school football” played for at least a year, but we don’t have data on whether they played before, or continued to play later on. Plus, we don’t have health records. Football may have also changed a lot from the 1950s until now; today, the game may be more aggressive.
Still, the study highlights the need for further research and the ways in which the narrative around traumatic brain injury might have been skewed, Small says. “There’s a lot of attention on CTE without solid research showing how prevalent it is,” he says. For instance, some football players experiencing depression think they have CTE because they think CTE is extremely common. Then, they feel hopeless and don’t get help because they believe that CTE is “irreversible.” But it could be that they have depression without brain injury, and could be treated.
Next, Small’s team wants to see if more detailed exposure data on football — like how many years someone played, or the position — changes the outcome. People need more information to make a decision about football, since playing sports can obviously have positive effects too, he says. So, would Small tell his own child to play? “My feeling is that, along the spectrum of things that carry health risks, it might be that football is in the moderate category instead of the extreme category,” he says. “But further research needs to be done.”
Most Popular
- Sony’s PlayStation 5 is $200 off for the first time since December
- Anthropic’s most dangerous AI model just fell into the wrong hands
- Elon Musk admits that millions of Tesla vehicles won’t get unsupervised FSD
- You’re about to feel the AI money squeeze
- Microsoft launches ‘vibe working’ in Word, Excel, and PowerPoint











