Epic v. Google: everything we learned in Fortnite court
See all Stories
S
“Our goals were to do better against Apple collectively with Samsung.”
Discussing the scrapped Project Banyan deal with Samsung, Rosenberg wrote on June 6th, 2019, that “it created an incentive dynamic where the store teams would be competing with each other.”
Asked Epic’s lawyer: “Your goals were not to compete?”
Rosenberg replied that the point was to join Samsung in competing against Apple. I suspect that Epic’s lawyers will gleefully point out that none of the documents mention Apple a little later today.
In the meanwhile, Epic is pointing out how uncompetitive this bit from Rosenberg’s email seems:
“If we couldn’t use rev share to secure confidence that they won’t drive down to 5%, then we wouldn’t do it.”
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...
Most Popular
Most Popular
- One of Google’s Android partners turned 1.3 million set-top boxes into a botnet
- Xbox’s former COO has ‘serious concerns’ about her abrupt departure
- The 2026 iPad Mini is a terrific tiny tablet — for a big price
- Bambu’s nine-nozzle H3C foretells the future of 3D printing
- The Elder Scrolls VI officially has a name: Sentinel
