Epic v. Google: everything we learned in Fortnite court
See all Stories
S
“You can’t say that any of those $40 billion in costs can necessarily be allocated to Google Play, can you?”
Google’s accounting professor waffles a bit, starts coming up with explanations, and Judge Donato makes him answer “yes, no, or I don’t know.”
“Yes, I think some of them should be,” Skinner finally replies. But then Epic’s attorney shows he replied differently in an old deposition: “I’m not necessarily opining that these Android costs should be allocated.”
Epic gets him to admit that he has not determined which costs should be allocated. “Well, I think I’ve made clear that at least the portion of the costs of these for the ecosystem,” he begins, before getting cut off.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...
Most Popular
Most Popular
- New Zelda and GTA represent a games industry that no longer exists
- HomePod Mini 2 first look: Three things I love and one disappointment
- Sam Altman says it’s better for RAM to be in a data center than on your desk
- Keyboards of The Verge
- Sam Altman sympathizes with mathematicians, but says OpenAI’s math onslaught won’t stop
