Epic v. Google: everything we learned in Fortnite court
See all Stories
Why did Google seemingly sit on its hands for well over a year after Apple dropped its App Store fee for subscriptions, before eventually matching that rate? That’s what Epic is pushing Gennai to explain on the stand, and the answers aren’t clear.
Google’s primary answer so far is that these things take time, but we’re seeing internal Google executive summaries that at least suggest Google was taking that time intentionally.
I haven’t seen any proof Google was being greedy, but it did seem worried about how developers would react: one executive summary of a meeting between top Play Store execs shows they were so concerned with the “Spotify plan” that changing the Play Store policy seemingly hinged on Spotify.
“Make go-no go pending Spotify status” was listed as a recommendation right under “Change rev share to 30(3mo/15)” and “Change policy for all (with risk mitigation measures and exceptions).” I wonder what those exceptions were.
Most Popular
- Sam Altman says it’s better for RAM to be in a data center than on your desk
- I built an AI Tamagotchi before Meta could
- The Apple Pencil turned the Duo into my new favorite notebook
- Sam Altman sympathizes with mathematicians, but says OpenAI’s math onslaught won’t stop
- Here’s why you can’t shake those unhinged political texts
