Epic v. Google: everything we learned in Fortnite court
See all Stories
“Google’s objectives in taking the actions that affect the way the ecosystem operates have the objective of maximizing Google’s value. They do not have the purpose of maximizing the total value of the platform to all parties,” he tells Epic lead attorney Gary Bornstein.
“Because there’s competition, Google can’t extract as much because there’s a smaller share,” he says, showing us a pair of pie charts: one where Google has a $35 slice of a $50 pie and one where Google has a $10 slice of a $100 one.
(The $100 pie is supposed to represent competition in Android; the small pie “impaired” competition.)
He also says Google’s comparison of Android to the old Symbian OS is flawed because phones from rival manufacturers used different versions. “Each had their own versions of Symbian and each was incompatible with the other.”
Most Popular
- Samsung’s wider Z Fold 8 feels just right
- The new Halo remake is a reminder of what Xbox used to be
- Google hit with $1 billion fine for breaking EU antitrust rules
- The right-wing boomers protesting data centers have a lot in common with the left
- The sci-fi movie that imagines AI isn’t so dystopian after all
