Epic v. Google: everything we learned in Fortnite court
See all Stories
S
“Her market definition is so broad, so incomprehensible, it is, and I do not use this word lightly, absurd.”
Epic’s lead attorney on Google’s optimal market definition for this case, the one that Professor Tucker brought up and the judge was broadly skeptical of in court.
He’s pointing the jury to the very first question on their verdict form, where they get to decide if there’s a relevant antitrust market for this case. That’s important: if they choose that the market is anything other than Android app distribution and Android in-app payment solutions, Epic’s unlikely to win.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...
Most Popular
Most Popular
- Sam Altman says it’s better for RAM to be in a data center than on your desk
- The Apple Pencil turned the Duo into my new favorite notebook
- Sam Altman sympathizes with mathematicians, but says OpenAI’s math onslaught won’t stop
- I built an AI Tamagotchi before Meta could
- Here’s why you can’t shake those unhinged political texts
