The Supreme Court hears arguments for two cases that could reshape the future of the internet
See all Stories
T
“I don’t understand how a neutral suggestion about something you’ve expressed an interest in is aiding and abetting. I just don’t understand it.”
Justice Thomas sanely rebuts the plaintiff’s argument that simply providing a phone number of a terrorist in a search result constitutes “aiding and abetting” an enemy. Even the creation of URLs seems up for grabs here, according to plaintiffs. Talk about blowing up the internet!
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...
