A
AI inventors aren’t getting their day in court.
The Supreme Court has declined a petition from computer scientist Stephen Thaler to consider whether artificial intelligence systems can be awarded patents. That leaves Thaler with an appeals court and federal court’s earlier answer of “no.”
The US Patent and Trademark Office and a federal judge in Virginia rejected his patent applications for the inventions on the grounds that [Thaler’s AI system] DABUS is not a person. The patent-focused US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld those decisions last year and said US patent law unambiguously requires inventors to be human beings.
Sorry, DABUS.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...
Most Popular
Most Popular
- The US is charging an American citizen for wiping his phone at the border
- Marvel announces Ryan Gosling as Ghost Rider, a new Black Panther, and more
- Forget expensive sleepbuds. Buy this pillow instead
- Google basically confirms the Pixel 11 is getting a price hike
- After backlash, Meta pauses plan to ‘rate limit’ its smart glasses
