Ahhhh and now we have conflicts of interest – Breaking News & Latest Updates 2026
Skip to main content

The SEC’s case against Binance, a live reading by Liz Lopatto

See all Stories

E
Quote
Ahhhh and now we have conflicts of interest!

So Sigma Chain was a market maker on Binance.US because it was Binance’s “own,” the complaint claims Zhao said. Merit Peak was also a market maker controlled by Zhao. “Sigma Chain’s and Merit Peak’s activity on the Binance.US Platform, and their undisclosed relationship with Zhao and Binance, have involved and continue to present conflicts between Zhao’s financial interests and those of Binance.US Platform’s customers,” the complaint says.

Also, one of the CEOs of BAM Trading didn’t like it:

“To the extent that these two liquidity providers were significant sources of liquidity, meaning that our customers couldn’t, you know, clear orders without the presence of those makers on our platform, I thought that was a real problem. It suggested that the company was, in fact, heavily dependent on CZ, not just as a control person but also as an economic counterparty and that is problematic, so I thought we needed to look into deplatforming them.”

A flow chart showing that Zhao controlled: CPZ Holdings, Binance Holdings Limited, Sigma Chain AG, Merit Peak Limited, and Coin Market Cap. Nested under CPZ Holdings is BAM Management, a parent of Binance US.
Here’s that chart again lol
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Comments
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...