Supreme Court hears arguments on the future of online speech: all the news
See all Stories
A
Clarence Thomas is still trying to make this Section 230 argument happen.
It’s been brought up by other justices in passing, but Thomas really keeps harping on whether striking down this law should mean Section 230 is unjustifiable. He’s bringing up some questions that are interesting but also pretty tangential to the core case, like whether “deep learning algorithms” are platform speech. (Clement says... probably.) “What is the algorithm saying?” Thomas asks.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...











