They’ve sent a letter asking for any communications the FCC had with ABC and other parties involved with Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, and asked Carr to detail exactly how he defines the “public interest” that broadcasters must adhere to. “Under your leadership, the FCC appears to be discarding Congress’s clear directive in the Communications Act to ensure broadcasters act in the “public interest” — and is instead requiring them to act in ‘Trump’s interest,’” they write.
Adi Robertson

Senior Editor, Tech & Policy
Senior Editor, Tech & Policy
More From Adi Robertson

Is now really the time to put up ID checkpoints on the internet?

The First Amendment matters, even if Disney and ABC were cowards, too.
The Verge and other outlets have periodically called Elon Musk’s DOGE “fake” or “not real,” because its status in the government is bizarrely ambiguous. As discovered by Bluesky user iucouno and verified by us, Google’s AI search apparently ingested this and concluded... well, something pretty weird.
We’ve seen freelancers lean on AI, but this Press Gazette report about a writer who published multiple stories with apparently fake sources at high-profile sites takes things to a new level:
The article cites “Jessica Hu, 34, an ordained officiant based in Chicago” who it says “has made a name for herself as a ‘digital celebrant,’ specialising in ceremonies across Twitch, Discord, and VRChat”. However, no such officiant appears to exist.

If you want to know what an AI system is doing, look for transparency from the creator instead.
From author J.M. Berger on Bluesky, a proposal to avoid chatbot psychosis:
- The bot should never express emotions.
- The bot should never praise the user.
- The bot should never say it understands the user’s mental state.
A tough order for companion bots, of course — which lots of companies want their general-purpose AI to be.






