Adi Robertson

“Today’s denial of review in the Reddit case suggests that their aversion was more than just about the Google case, specifically – and that the court is willing, at least for now, to leave any changes to Section 230 to Congress,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law.

There’s not much money in writing already, so hype around new technology as a ready replacement for existing labor is exacerbating reminders of how little stability is on offer in creative fields.

But in the process of expressing outrage at people eager to leverage the hype to personal benefit — people rushing to “get theirs” through technology trained on other people’s output — there is a thread of commentary that undermines the very richness of literary tradition we’re ostensibly fighting for in the first place.

The increasing use of mind-altering drugs in the United States for purposes that blur the line between medical treatment, self-help, and recreation, makes it particularly difficult to ascertain whether this content should be treated as promoting pharmaceutical drugs, which is generally allowed on the platform, or as endorsing drugs for non-prescribed purposes or in order to achieve a high, which is generally not allowed.

Will you commit to consistently deleting sensitive location data that pertains to any type of reproductive care, mental health care, and addiction treatment within 24 hours of a user’s visit, on both the user’s device and Google servers? Will you agree to a third-party audit to verify that such a protocol has been successfully implemented?