170 – Breaking News & Latest Updates 2026
Skip to main content

Tom Warren

Tom Warren

Senior Correspondent

Senior Correspondent

    More From Tom Warren

    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    Day two is over.

    It has been a long day of questioning and we even ran over the allocated time to squeeze in witness testimony from former Google Stadia product lead Dov Zimring.

    If you’re interested in what Xbox chief Phil Spencer had to say earlier please check out our first recap of his testimony, followed by our second recap after the lunch break.

    The hearing will resume on Tuesday at 8:30AM PT / 11:30AM ET so check back here for all the latest news. Thanks for tuning in, and have a great weekend!

    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    Judge Corley cut off the FTC’s Phil Spencer questioning.

    It feels like Judge Corley grew tired of the FTC’s questioning of Phil Spencer earlier. Judge Corley cut in when the FTC was asking if Spencer could legally bind Microsoft into keeping Diablo on PlayStation. A Microsoft lawyer objected and Judge Corley said “your point has been made, move along.”

    Then later Judge Corley directly cut off the FTC’s questioning of Spencer after the regulator’s lawyer asked if Spencer could make a Call of Duty commitment for bringing the game to a Sony PlayStation cloud service.

    “I don’t think that’s it, I’m going to cut off the questioning there,” said Judge Corley.

    There was an audible “ooof” from a few members of the audience watching on, MLex reporter Michael Acton, who is in the courtroom, says.

    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    Google prototyped Stadia running on Windows servers.

    Google’s former Stadia product lead, Dov Zimring, has given us some early insights into Stadia development:

    “We had prototyped on Windows early on... the mission we had established at the very beginning was to enable revolutionary experiences... we saw Windows as limiting to innovate in that regard because we didn’t have control over the operating system.”

    Google did hint at Windows games running on Stadia, but that’s very different to actually running Stadia games on a Windows server.

    So why didn’t Google go with Windows for Stadia?

    “[Windows] would have doubled our total cost of operating on hardware that was equivalent to the 8th generation consoles, like the PlayStation 4.”

    The Google Stadia controller
    Image: Google
    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    What was Stadia?

    The FTC opens its questioning of Dov Zimring, Google’s former Stadia product lead, by asking what Stadia was and when it was shut down.

    Zimring says it was key for Stadia to “have sufficient content... to have blockbusters at the right time,” which is probably a big part of why it failed. Asked about Stadia’s technology, Zimring says:

    “To our knowledge we had the best technology in the market. We had performance capabilities that didn’t exist in the [cloud] market like 4K.”

    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    Google’s former Stadia product lead is taking the stand.

    Up next we have Dov Zimring, Google’s former Stadia product lead. The FTC has been focusing on Microsoft’s cloud competition in this case, so we’re likely to hear more about that. Perhaps we’ll even get some insight into why Google shutdown Stadia earlier this year.

    During yesterday’s testimony we learned that Microsoft was working on a separate “dedicated” version of Xbox Cloud Gaming in September 2022. That’s the same month Google announced its Stadia shutdown. Microsoft now says it’s no longer planning a separate version due to costs and usage.

    Dov Zimring, Google’s former Stadia product lead.
    Dov Zimring, Google’s former Stadia product lead.
    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    Spencer is teaching the FTC how acquisitions work.

    You can tell Xbox chief Phil Spencer is frustrated by the FTC’s questions here. He remains calm, but he shoots back to illustrate his knowledge of financials and acquisitions.

    “Now you have a $70 billion upfront payment to Activision, right?” asks the FTC lawyer. Spencer’s response:

    “No, when you acquire something it’s not a payment. It’s like when you buy a house. You’re buying an asset that has value so it’s really a transfer of cash into an asset called Activision, that you believe retains the value that you acquired. So to try and characterize the $70 billion as somehow spent is incorrect. Financially, it’s really moving $70 billion in cash into an asset, which is a game publisher, that to us is actually worth more than $70 billion, so it is not spent.”

    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    We’re back to the FTC and Microsoft arguing about the Switch.

    This is getting rather tedious now. The FTC has console props in the courtroom to try and show the Xbox Series X / S and PS5 are very different to the Nintendo Switch.

    It’s ”incorrect to say Nintendo isn’t a competitor,” says Xbox chief Phil Spencer and he comments on the visual appearance of the consoles in the courtroom:

    “The PS5 and Xbox Series X shipped at the same time... from a form factor these two functionally look more equivalent.”

    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    The FTC digs into the Xbox business.

    The FTC wants to know about the Xbox business and why Microsoft is spending nearly $70 billion on Activision Blizzard.

    FTC: your business is not necessarily meeting its internal targets today?

    “It is not right now, no,” admits Spencer.

    FTC: so you’re paying $70 billion for a mobile business?

    “The business is across mobile, PC and console, but when you think about the unique opportunity relative to our business today, it’s that mobile engagement that Activision drives.”

    Spencer then says Microsoft is trying to grow the overall Xbox business it’s not just about console:

    “We are trying to compete in the market by growing our business. Some of our business growth is something that our competitors would like to have, so some of our growth is probably from our competitors not realizing that growth themselves.”

    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    We’re back and the FTC is grilling Spencer on CoD.

    The FTC is back to question Phil Spencer, and the FTC’s lawyer wants to run a little late to make sure we hear from a Google witness about Stadia.

    The FTC begins by asking Spencer “can you swear under oath that you can promise that you’ll ship Call of Duty on PlayStation” without looking at the terms?

    “That’s my goal yes. If what you’re trying to propose is that Sony might change the terms of how we ship games on our platform then that would prohibit us from shipping on their platforms.”

    The FTC asks why the contract for CoD on PlayStation is different to standard Sony contracts:

    “Sony is asking for significant commitments... even thought we know how to ship games on PlayStation that we do on a regular basis.”

    After some back and forth about whether future Activision games will ship on PlayStation, a Microsoft lawyer objects and Judge Corley cuts in. “Your point has been made, move along.”

    Tom Warren
    Tom Warren
    10-minute break, let’s recap.

    Spencer has spent most of his time after lunch discussing mobile, how Microsoft thought about buying Zynga, relationships with Sony, and how Microsoft’s rivals have far more exclusive games. This is your latest recap:

    • Microsoft found “very limited success” of making mobile games outside of Minecraft.

    • Microsoft tried to buy Zynga to rectify its missed mobile gaming opportunity.

    • Microsoft and Sony discussed the Activision deal with “positive affirmations” from Sony’s CEO.

    • Spencer says Microsoft’s rivals have far more exclusive games