7 – Breaking News & Latest Updates 2026
Skip to main content

Law

These days, some of tech’s most important decisions are being made inside courtrooms. Google and Facebook are fending off antitrust accusations, while patent suits determine how much control of their own products they can have. The slow fight over Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act threatens platforms like Twitter and YouTube with untold liability suits for the content they host. Gig economy companies like Uber and Airbnb are fighting for their very existence as their workers push for the protections of full-time employees. In each case, judges and juries are setting the rules about exactly how far tech companies can push the envelope and exactly how much protection everyday people have. This is where we keep track of those legal fights and the broader principles behind them. When you move fast and break things, it shouldn’t be too much of a surprise when you end up in court.

Illegally fired FTC commissioners on Meta, bribes, and fighting for privacy

Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Slaughter want to take their fight to the Supreme Court, and they think they can win.

Nilay Patel
Brendan Carr’s FCC is an anti-consumer, rights-trampling harassment machine

Protecting broadband access is out — fighting diversity and the free press are in.

Karl Bode
Wes Davis
Wes Davis
You wouldn’t steal a font.

But the folks behind the mid-2000s anti-piracy campaign that once compared pirating software to stealing a car might have, reports Torrent Freak. A social media investigation suggests the campaign used a knockoff of a commercial font. Its creator, Just Van Rossum, told the outlet:

“I knew my font was used for the campaign and that a pirated clone named XBand-Rough existed. I did not know that the campaign used XBand-Rough and not FF Confidential, though. So this fact is new to me, and I find it hilarious,”

Tina Nguyen
Tina Nguyen
Did an AI write your bar exam?

If you’re an aspiring lawyer in California, it probably did: the State Bar recently admitted that some of the multiple-choice questions in their recent bar exam were written with AI assistance. A “speechless” Mary Basick, assistant dean at UC Irvine Law School, told the L.A. Times that several students had complained that the questions seemed AI-generated. “I defended the bar,” she said. “‘No way! They wouldn’t do that!’”

Federal prosecutors are still resigning over Eric Adams

Trump’s assault on rule of law and plans for mass deportation collide in a months-long shake-up at the DOJ.

Gaby Del Valle
Jess Weatherbed
Jess Weatherbed
AI bot personas may be undercover police.

404 Media reports US police departments are utilizing Overwatch — an AI tool that “deploys lifelike virtual agents” to “infiltrate and engage criminal networks” — to collect incriminating evidence against anyone from suspected drug and human traffickers, to “radicalized” political activists and “college protesters.”

One example of a “radicalized” AI persona that developer Massive Blue says it has created is one pretending to be a 36-year-old child-free divorced woman, described as outspoken, lonely, and body positive. Her hobbies include baking and, vaguely, “activism.”

Lauren Feiner
Lauren Feiner
Apple, Google, and Snap accuse Meta of being reckless with their confidential info.

We’re getting started with day three of Meta’s antitrust trial with some controversy. A Snap attorney complains to Judge Boasberg that Meta released slides with inadvertently flawed redactions. He also accuses Meta’s lead attorney of openly referencing Snap’s competitive assessments that should have been private.

An Apple attorney echoes Snap’s charges of “egregious” disclosures, saying Apple can’t be confident that Meta will protect its internal information moving forward. Google’s attorney says its data has been jeopardized by Meta, too.

Jess Weatherbed
Jess Weatherbed
Tech CEO charged for faking AI with human labor.

Albert Sangier’s Nate service claimed it enabled customers to “skip the checkout” using artificial intelligence, but reporting by The Information in 2022 revealed that “between 60 percent and 100 percent” of transactions were actually handled manually — primarily by workers in the Philippines. And this isn’t the only company to be caught doing it.

The DOJ has now charged Sangier with securities fraud and wire fraud following an FBI investigation, describing his company as “a scheme filled with smoke and mirrors.”

Wes Davis
Wes Davis
The White House must give AP its Oval Office access back.

In February, the Trump administration started turning Associated Press reporters away from media events at the White House after the outlet refused to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.” Now, District Judge Trevor McFadden has ordered the White House to end the practice, spotted Politico’s Kyle Cheney.

Richard Lawler
Richard Lawler
Trump commutes Ozy Media founder Carlos Watson’s fraud sentence.

In July, Carlos Watson was convicted on fraud charges for misleading investors with falsified financial records, inflated audience numbers, and made-up business deals. The New York Times reported in 2021 that his co-founder, Samir Rao, had impersonated a YouTube exec on a call with bankers about a potential $40 million investment.

But now that Donald Trump commuted his 116-month sentence on the day he was scheduled to report, Watson won’t even start. The one-year probation for the now-defunct Ozy, as well as $96 million in restitution and penalties, have also been wiped away.

Tina Nguyen
Tina Nguyen
Donald Trump pardons BitMEX co-founders.

Less than three months after the BitMEX crypto exchange was hit with a $100 million fine for money laundering – and hours after he pardoned ex-Nikola CEO Trevor Milton for defrauding investors in his EV company – Trump issued pardons to Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Dalo and Samuel Reed, CNBC reported Friday. The three men had previously pled guilty to several felony charges related to money laundering and failure to police the exchange.

Tina Nguyen
Tina Nguyen
And the Most Tortured Signal-Gate Backronym Award goes to…

Rep. Ritchie Torres and the House Democrats, who are reportedly drafting a bill entitled “The HOUTHI PC SMALL GROUP Act” that would criminalize the use of unsecured messaging apps to send classified information. (Per Axios, it’s an acronym for “Homeland Operations and Unilateral Tactics Halting Incursions: Preventing Coordinated Subversion, Military Aggression and Lawless Levies Granting Rogue Operatives Unchecked Power.”)

Richard Lawler
Richard Lawler
Meta, Elon Musk, and Delaware’s rush to rework corporate law.

Elon Musk has publicly railed against Delaware’s corporate law as its judges ruled against his wishes, moving the incorporation of Tesla and other companies out of state. Now, CNBC says a January WSJ report that Meta was considering moving its incorporation spurred immediate action from the governor on a new bill, SB 21, that might make its laws friendlier to folks like Musk and Mark Zuckerberg.

After skipping a typical review by the state’s bar association, it’s passed the state Senate and could be voted on by the state House as soon as Thursday.

Sarah Jeong
Sarah Jeong
“That’s a sham.”

After a heated hearing in a California district court this morning, Judge William Alsup ruled that the Trump administration must offer to reinstate thousands of federal workers who were fired as part of the DOGE cuts. There were a lot of things that irked the judge, though most predictably, he did not like that an Office of Personnel Management official ghosted the court after being ordered to testify. (“I’m getting mad,” the judge said.)

Longtime Verge readers will recognize Alsup as the unforgivingly exact judge in cases like Oracle v. Google and Waymo v. Uber, a hobbyist coder who studied engineering at Mississippi State.

Why Trump can’t be trusted with Congress’ new anti-deepfake bill

The Take It Down Act could give Trump an unprecedented tool to target his enemies.

Nilay Patel
Richard Lawler
Richard Lawler
Judge dismisses copyright infringement lawsuit over Apple’s Tetris movie.

Former Gizmodo EIC Dan Ackerman’s lawsuit alleging that Apple, the Tetris company, screenwriter Noah Pink and others ripped off his 2016 book, The Tetris Effect: The Game That Hypnotized the World, for their 2023 Apple TV Plus movie has been dismissed. Reuters reports Ackerman’s lawyer said he will appeal the decision.

In her ruling, Judge Katherine Failla writes:

Ultimately, the Court finds that Defendants’ Film is not substantially similar to Plaintiff’s Book and that Plaintiff has failed to allege that Defendants misappropriated the way he selected, coordinated, and arranged the facts in his Book.

Where the Book’s tone is informative, the Film’s is suspenseful and dramatic, at times deviating from the true facts underlying the story and going so far as to invent an entire KGB subplot, which takes up significant screen time, to create that theatrical effect.