California voters rejected Prop 30, which would have increased taxes on people making over $2 million a year to subsidize electric vehicle purchases for low-income residents, among other climate change fighting measures. Opponents claimed the measure would have been a huge windfall for Lyft, even though it wasn’t really clear how. It’s a weird result, considering the state’s voters handed Lyft (and Uber) a giant win by approving Prop 22 just two years ago. Why so fickle, California?
Lyft


For anyone hoping to snag a job at their favorite pink-hued ride-hailing company, I’ve got some bad news: Lyft said it won’t be bringing on any new employees through the end of the year, citing economic instability. No lay-offs are being planned at this time, but the company has been trying to cut costs since this past spring. Maybe Uber is still hiring? (Probably not.)







Experts worry that rideshare drivers aren’t prepared



‘He was very drunk, so I was lucky’

Argo AI CEO Bryan Salesky on a new partnership with Lyft and setting realistic expectations for self-driving cars

‘The AV industry has promised too much for too long, and has delivered too little’















The victory of Prop 22 in California could set a precedent for how companies use technology to lobby for political outcomes




Most Popular
- Sony’s PlayStation 5 is $200 off for the first time since December
- Anthropic’s most dangerous AI model just fell into the wrong hands
- Elon Musk admits that millions of Tesla vehicles won’t get unsupervised FSD
- The unraveling of Dan Crenshaw
- I bought Alienware’s $350 OLED monitor and I can’t believe how good it is

























