That’s how Meta viewed the app when it was evaluating launching a competitor that would eventually be called Threads. The FTC is trying to use Meta’s internal evaluations of Twitter to show that it doesn’t see the primary reason for going to Twitter as connecting with friends and family — and therefore, it’s arguing, in a different market from the one it says Facebook and Instagram monopolize.
Mosseri says the app finds the most success in blending entertainment with interacting with friends. That could look like commenting on a public post about a sporting event and interacting with a friend in the comments, he says. That’s important since Meta noted in documents around 2018 that people were sharing less in their feeds, and public content was increasing. The FTC is trying to point out that even if posting to the apps has declined, there’s still friends and family interaction happening.
The FTC is beginning its questioning of the Meta executive by fleshing out what users want out of Instagram. The testimony will help shape how the judge thinks about the market Meta competes in: a limited market in social media networking to keep up with friends and family, or a broader market including entertainment that encompasses apps like TikTok and YouTube.
Schultz began testifying about how Meta tracked the rise of mobile messaging apps. Mosseri is expected to take the stand tomorrow and we’ll go live again then.
Alex Schultz, who’s worked at Meta for years in growth and analytics, is now testifying. He clarifies during the FTC’s introductory questions that while there are multiple VPs of analytics, he is “the” VP of analytics. While I was across the courthouse covering Apple executive Eddy Cue’s testimony in the Google remedies case, WhatsApp chief Will Cathcart was testifying earlier today, followed by an FTC expert who surveyed users about their main motivations for using various social media apps.
