She used it to prank Snap CEO Evan Spiegel, make a TikTok, and even spoof Chase’s voice biometrics. You really should watch her whole video about it. (She wrote about it, too.)
Ai Artificial Intelligence Archive
Archives for April 2023
Sadly, I was not able to work Laser Bong into this episode, but I’ll keep working at it.


Add VentureBeat to the growing list of publishers who are using AI tools to produce content. Until now, most outlets have included at least some disclosure when AI is involved. But VentureBeat’s editorial director thinks it’s not necessary:
Nuñez said VentureBeat ... doesn’t attribute an article with “sentences and fragments” from a chatbot “as long as it’s truthful” and independently verified.
“I don’t think our readers care, to be totally honest,” he said. “Tweet that out, if you want.”
Well, VentureBeat readers?
[Bloomberg.com]
But the cost is “crazy” at about seven cents per query, CTO Andrew Bosworth recently told employees. From last night’s edition of my Command Line newsletter:
“That’s the only place in the company we’re really considering working with Microsoft and OpenAI, just because there’s a natural business integration there,” he explained. “Otherwise, we’re working on a companion that is more about all of our code and our internal documentation, built on our own infrastructure. We are moving very fast. I think we’ll have something to play with internally, I’m hoping in mid-June, maybe late June.”
You can sign up at the link below to read the whole newsletter, which is sent to subscribers every Thursday.
[The Verge]
The Financial Times reported on some of the ways the previously-independent DeepMind will have to change now that Google has created the new Google DeepMind organization.
But it was not yet clear how the reorganisation would result in more ambitious commercial products, the people said. After all, DeepMind had never actively advocated the need to make money from its work. Those close to [Google DeepMind leader Demis] Hassabis argue that he understands now is the moment for change.


The site, called Hot Chat 3000, is a one-to-one online chat website where who you talk to depends on a one to 10 scale of how attractive you are, a ranking determined by AI.
This is, obviously, a terrible idea for a dating app, and that’s kind of the point. MSCHF’s project is supposed to explore the inherent biases of AI — and how we can manipulate them:
HC3K is a highly imperfect, transparently AI-governed platform. Treat it like a sandbox; figure out how to get 10s back from the machine; learn how to manipulate it.
The Information has a long article about Apple’s recent internal issues with Siri. With the tech industry’s new obsession with AI chatbots, the challenges facing Apple’s voice assistant aren’t going to get any easier, but the report does say that the company is internally proposing LLM-based improvements to Siri.
[The Information]
As per a comment from OP, the video uses a combination of AI tools (script by GPT-4, images by Midjourney, video by Runway’s Gen-2, voiceover by ElevenLabs) and the end result is... interesting. I mean, obviously not a good advert, but for 3 hours’ worth of work it’s also strangely compelling. Huh.










